ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JRRolex · 6 November 2007, 07:55 PM

Sorry guys, this is a follow up to my other post, asking if theoretically, a crystal from an SD would fit a 14060 sub. The concensus seemed to be "No' but after researching a bit, I'm finding the SD and 14060 ND sub share the same diameter crystal (29.40mm?) as I'm finding the date Sub has a slightly larger crystal? Sorry for my persistence, I'm not at all questioning the many well-versed experts here on TRF, Just curious if someone could confirm this? John

SPACE-DWELLER · 6 November 2007, 07:58 PM

Crystal numbers! CLICK!

JRRolex · 6 November 2007, 08:14 PM

Bo, I saw the numbers but they don't tell the dimensions in mm. You had the SD- what was the crystals diameter, and was it smaller than the sub date? (I realize it's thicker) Thanks, John

SPACE-DWELLER · 6 November 2007, 08:30 PM

I would say that you don't need diametres since spare part numbers are spare parts numbers, and the SD and 14060 use two DIFFERENT spare part crystals!

But here are some diametres, all the same:

Rolex diametres! CLICK!

JRRolex · 6 November 2007, 08:38 PM

29.2 & 29.5 respectively. Oooops, you did tell me that before, sorry , i forgot. thanks. -J

JRRolex · 6 November 2007, 08:47 PM

Bo wrote:
"I would say that you don't need diametres since spare part numbers are spare parts numbers, and the SD and 14060 use two DIFFERENT spare part crystals! "

I was hoping that was because of the crystal thickness only- not the diameter. but that's why I'm the Noob! -john

6 November 2007, 07:55 PM	#1
JRRolex Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: John Location: usa Watch: Sub 14060m Posts: 61	Another Sd & 14060 crystal question Sorry guys, this is a follow up to my other post, asking if theoretically, a crystal from an SD would fit a 14060 sub. The concensus seemed to be "No' but after researching a bit, I'm finding the SD and 14060 ND sub share the same diameter crystal (29.40mm?) as I'm finding the date Sub has a slightly larger crystal? Sorry for my persistence, I'm not at all questioning the many well-versed experts here on TRF, Just curious if someone could confirm this? John

6 November 2007, 07:58 PM	#2
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	Crystal numbers! CLICK! __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

6 November 2007, 08:30 PM	#4
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	I would say that you don't need diametres since spare part numbers are spare parts numbers, and the SD and 14060 use two DIFFERENT spare part crystals! But here are some diametres, all the same: Rolex diametres! CLICK! __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

6 November 2007, 08:14 PM	#3
JRRolex Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: John Location: usa Watch: Sub 14060m Posts: 61	Bo, I saw the numbers but they don't tell the dimensions in mm. You had the SD- what was the crystals diameter, and was it smaller than the sub date? (I realize it's thicker) Thanks, John

6 November 2007, 08:38 PM	#5
JRRolex Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: John Location: usa Watch: Sub 14060m Posts: 61	29.2 & 29.5 respectively. Oooops, you did tell me that before, sorry , i forgot. thanks. -J

6 November 2007, 08:47 PM	#6
JRRolex Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: John Location: usa Watch: Sub 14060m Posts: 61	Bo wrote: "I would say that you don't need diametres since spare part numbers are spare parts numbers, and the SD and 14060 use two DIFFERENT spare part crystals! " I was hoping that was because of the crystal thickness only- not the diameter. but that's why I'm the Noob! -john

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)