ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Flip the SD for the SS GMT IIc? | |||
Yes | 54 | 48.21% | |
No | 58 | 51.79% | |
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
6 November 2007, 01:02 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
YES!
Did some phone calls! I will collect it Thursday! AND I got 10 % off the MSRP!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
6 November 2007, 01:04 AM | #62 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: baxta69
Location: suffolk, UK
Watch: Breit Cross/SS sub
Posts: 130
|
Bo Bo Bo
what are you doing man? have you lost it completely?
sub to sd to gmt II and back and forth ........you could almost dance to the rythm of your flipping dude SUBMARINERS ROCK A FAT ONE....turn back before its too late |
6 November 2007, 01:08 AM | #63 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York
Watch: Pepsi,LV,SSDJ
Posts: 343
|
Wow, I can't belive it's gone. Good luck with the new one.
|
6 November 2007, 03:15 AM | #64 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
Do what you want Dude! Have fun with your Rolex collecting!
|
6 November 2007, 03:25 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: NYC
Watch: SS Daytona B/W
Posts: 362
|
Congrats Bo! i know you'll give us good pics! maybe even a couple pics of it on a sponge!
seriously, did getting the 116520 influence your decision on flipping the SD? Did it seem 'old' to you compared to the GMT IIc?
__________________
SLR |
6 November 2007, 03:38 AM | #66 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Quote:
Since at first I did not think of the difference between the SD and the GMT IIc, and the SS Cos was not involved in the decision, at all. BUT: When I got the SD ready for being picked up by the person who bought it, YES, then it suddenly struck me how NOISY the bracelet of the SD (and "conventional" Rolex bracelets before some of them were updated) is. I only thought about it in that very minute I touched my SD again (having worn my SS Cos for about a month's time now whose bracelet is not the least bit noisy!).
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
6 November 2007, 03:50 AM | #67 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Steven
Location: the OC
Watch: SS GMT II-C, SD
Posts: 186
|
Can't believe I'm saying do it, but for 5k you're definitely coming out on top. Like all of our beloved pieces in current production, it can be easily replaced. I got my dweller about a week ago to keep my GMTII-C company and find that I'm much less concerned with it getting scratched. They have a completely different vibe. You'll see.
|
6 November 2007, 03:53 AM | #68 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,939
|
Bo,
Just wait until you get that GMT-c on your wrist, I believe you just may like it more than the Daytona!!!!!!!
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN |
6 November 2007, 04:15 AM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: NYC
Watch: SS Daytona B/W
Posts: 362
|
Quote:
Interesting...I was holding off on getting a new (old) GMT, sub or SD b/c I'm convinced the bracelets will be updated. Who knows when, but they have to update with solid center links and better clasps, right? I'm at least going to wait until Basel 2008 to buy something in the SD or sub line.
__________________
SLR |
|
6 November 2007, 05:08 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Louie
Location: California
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 644
|
NO, Bo!
|
6 November 2007, 10:52 AM | #71 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: VA
Posts: 305
|
You have to be kidding?
"I voted YES, Bo....go for it.
I've owned two SDs in my life, but each time I missed the cyclops and never felt like I had a Rolex on my wrist." |
6 November 2007, 10:58 AM | #72 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
|
Bo,
When the GT arrives.. Please flip the Daytona my way. Mrdi |
6 November 2007, 11:07 AM | #73 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Craig
Location: NW Georgia
Watch: Blue Sub+Tud Chron
Posts: 834
|
Congrats on the new GMT-IIc! It's a really nice watch. I hope you enjoy it.
I voted before I read the whole thread and saw that you've already committed to the deal. I voted "No", but only because "Hell NO!" wasn't a choice. The new GMT is nice, but I really like the SD! I've only seen one in the wild in all my years of Rolex spotting. It's a shame you couldn't just add the GMT to the collection without getting rid of the SD. The REAL shame is that I can't muster up the cash to buy your SD! Rawhyde |
6 November 2007, 12:15 PM | #74 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: 116710
Posts: 80
|
|
6 November 2007, 05:47 PM | #75 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Quote:
Here it is (a super rare version of the Explorer, made for the Asian market to celebrate astronaut endeavour back then):
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
6 November 2007, 05:51 PM | #76 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
I wrote that on page 1:
Quote:
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
6 November 2007, 06:17 PM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
Jeez a lot happens when you're away from this place for a day,
Congrats Bo, I'm sure you won't regret it. Looking forward to seeing the pics. |
6 November 2007, 07:51 PM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
|
I'm a bit late to this party and see the SD has gone.
I would have kept the SD as I'm not that keen on GMT's (apart from the Pepsi's look) however I do appreciate it's merits and any new Rolex watch is cause for celebration. I hope you're as happy with this new watch as you were with your SD Bo. Congrats!!!!! J |
6 November 2007, 10:11 PM | #79 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
|
Quote:
But turning back to the topic at hand, I took a look at a SS GMTII-C, and loved it. Betcha won't flip that one as quick, they're very very nice in person. I didn't put it on my wrist, I know what would have happened . Your going to love it, Congradulations!
__________________
SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.