ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

gregdolley · 28 September 2012, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jay1988

Nice gesture.

Is it just me or is that label messed up ? It says a serving size is 16 pieces and then goes on to claim there are 16 servings per box. That comes out to 250 odd chocolates which there clearly isn't.

Here in the UK say you have a 100g box. A serving size would be 10g and there would be 10 servings per box etc. So unless there are 2.5kg of chocolate there then the label is wrong.

Or maybe I shouldn't be reading threads at 7 in the morning and will be corrected and made to look a fool.

You are right. I think it should say "servings per box 1" instead of 16. I mean, how else can you have over 700 calories per chocolate?!

Mikehii · 28 September 2012, 12:16 PM

Save it for few years so it will turn into vintage

Hairdude1 · 28 September 2012, 12:19 PM

Very cool!

deepmobb · 28 September 2012, 12:26 PM

Nice! Never seen that.

TSW · 29 September 2012, 03:29 AM

Those are delicious!!

28 September 2012, 12:16 PM	#32
Mikehii "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Michael Location: Malaysia Watch: Rolex Patek Posts: 324	Save it for few years so it will turn into vintage __________________ Daydate 228235, GMT Pepsi 116719 BLRO, Patek Philippe 5146G, Submariner 116618 LB, GMT Rootbeer 126715 CHNR, Submariner 116610LV HULK

29 September 2012, 03:29 AM	#35
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	Those are delicious!! __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

28 September 2012, 12:19 PM	#33
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Very cool!

28 September 2012, 12:26 PM	#34
deepmobb "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Toronto Posts: 16	Nice! Never seen that.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)