ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Ridly · 6 October 2012, 05:17 AM

Hello Everybody,

Earlier today I swung by my local Panerai dispensary and took a look at my next purchase. PAM 90 vs. PAM 321.

Just wanted to get peoples opinions on either or. The only thing that I don't like is the GMT hand on the 321. But it doesn't stick out all that much so I think I can get over it.

Just in case, is there a comparable PAM that doesn't have a GMT hand?

Wrist shots below.

Watchcraze007 · 6 October 2012, 05:52 AM

321 ;) Pam=the less noisy, the better. It is nice actually.

Travelller · 6 October 2012, 06:52 AM

321 (and plz think about that 320 I told you about - wink-wink)

p.s. Ok, 'I didn't see the GMT issue... well then the 312 is a better bet!

tmh888 · 6 October 2012, 06:59 AM

I like the 321, they are both beautiful though.

Cru Jones · 6 October 2012, 07:06 AM

Haven't handled the 321, but, can't one "hide" the GMT hand?

Anyway, both look good! If the GMT hand bothers you, then 90 is the one.

Unless you've considered the 423?

http://www.panerai.com/s_page.xpd?id...ategoria=11119

B. Doggy · 6 October 2012, 07:08 AM

You can hide the GMT hand without issue. This said, go for that one if it sings to you.

nick c · 6 October 2012, 10:07 AM

321

DiverAsia · 6 October 2012, 10:15 AM

Exhibition back and no cyclops date, I vote 321!
The 90 is sweet though, as I happen to like complicated dials.

Psmith · 6 October 2012, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cru Jones

Haven't handled the 321, but, can't one "hide" the GMT hand?

Anyway, both look good! If the GMT hand bothers you, then 90 is the one.

Unless you've considered the 423?

http://www.panerai.com/s_page.xpd?id...ategoria=11119

+1

bcacncnc · 6 October 2012, 11:27 AM

Consider also the 320.

Glenn422 · 6 October 2012, 02:13 PM

Why not go for the 312? Very similar to 321 but no GMT and power reserve :) Simpler, better, cheaper as well!

6 October 2012, 05:17 AM	#1
Ridly "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Andrew Location: Ny Watch: Explorer ii 42mm Posts: 219	I can't decide! Hello Everybody, Earlier today I swung by my local Panerai dispensary and took a look at my next purchase. PAM 90 vs. PAM 321. Just wanted to get peoples opinions on either or. The only thing that I don't like is the GMT hand on the 321. But it doesn't stick out all that much so I think I can get over it. Just in case, is there a comparable PAM that doesn't have a GMT hand? Wrist shots below. Attached Images

6 October 2012, 06:52 AM	#3
Travelller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: VIE Watch: my sig. ;) Posts: 3,092	321 (and plz think about that 320 I told you about - wink-wink) p.s. Ok, 'I didn't see the GMT issue... well then the 312 is a better bet! __________________ Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora

6 October 2012, 07:08 AM	#6
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	You can hide the GMT hand without issue. This said, go for that one if it sings to you. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

6 October 2012, 10:15 AM	#8
DiverAsia "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Rich Location: Taiwan Watch: 16014 16610 372 Posts: 1,044	Exhibition back and no cyclops date, I vote 321! The 90 is sweet though, as I happen to like complicated dials. __________________ He's a rebel and a runner He's a signal turning green He's a restless young romantic Wants to run the big machine

6 October 2012, 11:27 AM	#10
bcacncnc "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Bryan Location: Hong Kong Posts: 1,577	Consider also the 320. __________________ Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko

6 October 2012, 05:52 AM	#2
Watchcraze007 Banned Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: Ahmed Location: Dubai & Cairo Watch: All of'em! Posts: 507	321 ;) Pam=the less noisy, the better. It is nice actually.

6 October 2012, 06:59 AM	#4
tmh888 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: Trent Location: Sydney Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 51	I like the 321, they are both beautiful though.

6 October 2012, 07:06 AM	#5
Cru Jones 2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: CET Posts: 35,634	Haven't handled the 321, but, can't one "hide" the GMT hand? Anyway, both look good! If the GMT hand bothers you, then 90 is the one. Unless you've considered the 423? http://www.panerai.com/s_page.xpd?id...ategoria=11119

6 October 2012, 10:07 AM	#7
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	321

6 October 2012, 02:13 PM	#11
Glenn422 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: TRF Posts: 721	Why not go for the 312? Very similar to 321 but no GMT and power reserve :) Simpler, better, cheaper as well!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)