ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 October 2012, 11:56 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Riverside, CT
Posts: 52
|
16610 lv
Can anyone comment on the current / future value of the Anniv. Sub. since it is no longer produced?
|
26 October 2012, 12:06 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: S.Florida/Ontario
Watch: 6263, 1675
Posts: 2,259
|
the prices for a used LV seem to be pretty high right now, 6K plus too high in my opinion, but a good indicator for future value
__________________
life is good |
26 October 2012, 12:22 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
There is a boom right now. Some sellers trying to make a profit. Can't blame them.
We will see what happens. There are easy to find and not too expensive where I live. |
26 October 2012, 12:59 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
I'd say 5500-6000 depending on serial (Y,F) and condition
Going nowhere but up IMHO. It is important to buy a Y,F for maximum appreciation.It's really one of my favorites (It was my first Rolex). below is my F-Serial.
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
26 October 2012, 01:03 AM | #5 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
|
Quote:
This happens initially with every model that is discontinued, but, after time, they all fall back to typical levels.. Nothing really special about the LV, nor is it in short supply. No reason to expect that the long run will be any different for this model..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
26 October 2012, 01:30 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 59
|
I always see a lot on the sellers forum, take a look there to get an idea. As others said they are in higher demand lately since they are no longer in production.
|
26 October 2012, 01:38 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
I personally think they will appreciate.
* With that being said. I have no plans of selling mine... or buying another :-)
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
26 October 2012, 01:39 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,032
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
26 October 2012, 01:51 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Duncan
Location: Edinburgh
Watch: Submariner LV
Posts: 43
|
You've got me confused now, my one is an "F" serial, yet doesn't have the "flat 4" like you've got.
|
26 October 2012, 01:52 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 540
|
i disagree with those who claim the 16610LV to be just 'another' sub. how so?
the CLEAR differences are their for all too see and to imply otherwise is clearly misleading. as for appreciation? it is what it is although i feel the someone asking for over 10000 for one is insane......at this time 2012 7000 seems to be right. i purchased a V series in 2009 for 6700 and jan 2012 the same AD gave me 6700 for it. all this said the 16610LV should always command a PREMIUM over 'just another sub' |
26 October 2012, 02:48 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,222
|
I received my first Rolex as a gift in the spring of 2008. It was purchased in Philly on Walnut Street. I remember my parents essentially giving me the option of a SS Sub Date, SS Sub LV, and maybe the GMT. I cannot recall if the GMTIIC was out then or if they still had the older models out. I went with the SS Sub Date.
I think at the time I chose it because it was iconic and seemed to be the best "starter" Rolex but I definitely regret not choosing the LV now. I will never flip the watch because of what it means to me in sentiment (and the fact my initials are on the back) but I still am stuck in the limbo of wanting the LV but feeling like what the hell am I gonna do with two Submariners. Getting back to my opinion on the question posed in the thread... I think the LV will start to sink in price in a few years. I think the moderators hit it right on the head that now is that window period: the model has been discontinued long enough to develop some nostalgia and those that want it know they can get them in relatively great condition (new in some cases). It's also something of a transitional model with rehault engraving, maxi dial, but retaining the old clasp. The LV for me represents almost exactly the direction I wish Rolex went as far as case dimensions, maxi dial, and retention of the more utilitarian aluminum dial. Throw a new glide-lock clasp on the LV and you have essential my dream diver's watch. Just my opinion to spice up a thread I think we've gone over a few times. |
26 October 2012, 03:21 AM | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Quote:
|
|
26 October 2012, 03:27 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 44
|
NOS or sealed 16610LV - Y or early F with Flat 4 are sold in Germany for 8000 EUR. There is a big hype at moment.
|
26 October 2012, 04:08 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Brian
Location: Towson, MD
Watch: iZ
Posts: 2,224
|
I hope Puffy shares his thoughts on this. He has a beautiful collection of LV's and he has put glidelocks on them as well.
I believe that the more desirable LV serials will separate themselves in price from the other serials. The Y's and F's with the flat 4's are not as common as finding a later serial in the LV. |
26 October 2012, 04:42 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: in my house...
Posts: 5,524
|
the only one I would care for it is the Y series... beyond that serial they are all the same to me...
__________________
Cheers, Eduardo Be a WIS not a WUSS... and remove all the stickers.. |
26 October 2012, 04:50 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,858
|
I got my "Z" 16610LV in 2007 for £3,010 and I suspect the UK price is £4-4.5k now.
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
26 October 2012, 05:37 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
|
26 October 2012, 05:43 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 148
|
I think they will continue to go up, it's a collectible combination with the classic case, maxi dial and distinctive bezel. I do think its real appeal is for a collector of Subs though. I have an M series but its not the first Sub in my collection, IMHO I think you'd want the classic all black Sub if you were only going to have one.
Also I wouldnt stress too hard about which series to get. I've been collecting and trading for nearly 30 years and in my experience you may get a small premium for the first or last series models in a range but that's all. Check out current prices and there's not a massive difference between any of them. As ever condition and having all the stuff the watch came with is the big thing. Rgds GF |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.