IWC vs Panerai: need opinions

[mlotus95]

I am coming to the end of my watch buying days. i am on the fence if i want another Pam or an IWC? the pam's i am looking at is the 112 or the 000. only these two models. i have a 005 already. the IWC i am looking at is the 37701 or the Aquatimer. things i am considering are: how the model i buy holds it's value. movements i do like the fact that the iwc is an auto but that isn't a deal breaker. which one will hold up better to daily wear. any input from people familiar with these models would be helpful.

[subtona]

both nice pam may hold its value better but if you buy either preowned, it may be a non issue.

[xbox]

For me, IWC has the edge in the durability stakes, but it depends on materials and finishes to some extent.

However, without question Panerai would always hold its value significantly better.

[mlotus95]

i am leaning towards the pam but they are all nice.

[Cru Jones]

of those four and ignoring my collection, i would most want the zero. the 37701's date window bugs me and the aquatimer doesn't do much for me (if i had to take one, though, i think it would be the white dial on bracelet). as has been said, you could go pre-owned on the 000 and probably never lose money.

good luck with the tough choice!

[nycpassat]

I have the big pilot 5002 and currently in the market to buy my first Panerai. I think you would not go wrong with either choice. I do think Panerais hold their value a little better.

OTOH, you already own a 005. Why not expand your collection with a little variety?

[Cru Jones]

Originally Posted by nycpassat

OTOH, you already own a 005. Why not expand your collection with a little variety?

i missed that in the post.

have to agree! in the same price range, maybe a 380?

[kilyung]

If you're nearing the end of your collecting days, depending on age legibility may be an issue in which case I vote PAM. otherwise IWC.

[p_mcgee]

In general I prefer PAM over IWC, but in your case the 112 & 000 are too similar to the 005 you already own. No-brainer for IWC 37001. Some older Aquatimers are nice but the new ones look like they are made out of LEGOs & I'm a pass.

[wokafu]

Originally Posted by p_mcgee

In general I prefer PAM over IWC, but in your case the 112 & 000 are too similar to the 005 you already own. No-brainer for IWC 37001. Some older Aquatimers are nice but the new ones look like they are made out of LEGOs & I'm a pass.

x2 even though im not a big fan of the IWC 37701...i'll get one for variety

[travisb]

Given that you have a 005, this would also make me say go with the IWC.
Or maybe consider a more different PAM - maybe a Radiomir?

[Survivor]

I have the new, larger 3778 Double Chronograph......it just happens to be my favorite watch. I do however, also have tow Pams.........a 416 and a 425. Love them all.........now you decide

[nick c]

panerai

[nycpassat]

That double chrono is tough to beat!

Originally Posted by Survivor

I have the new, larger 3778 Double Chronograph......it just happens to be my favorite watch. I do however, also have tow Pams.........a 416 and a 425. Love them all.........now you decide

[psv]

I think a 44mm would hold its value a bit better, but then again, you should be able to get the IWC at a decent discount and then you won't take much of a hit.

Since you already have the Panerai I'd suggest going for the IWC. Personally I prefer a watch that is automatic and has a date, those other times you got your 005 (which is a very nice piece IMO).

Ideally I'd try to find the older 3717 though - I prefer that design and size.

[mlotus95]

Originally Posted by travisb

Given that you have a 005, this would also make me say go with the IWC.
Or maybe consider a more different PAM - maybe a Radiomir?

not a Radiomir fan. still on the fence though

[mlotus95]

Originally Posted by nycpassat

That double chrono is tough to beat!

i have to agree.

[B. Doggy]

Depends on your collection IMO

[thran]

Man that is such a tuff one, I own two pams but dont have a IWC yet, and I am drooling over the 7day portuguese

But you cant go wrong with either or

[Rex312]

Originally Posted by B. Doggy

Depends on your collection IMO

This. But I would take PAM all day.

[TSW]

Panerai everyday of the week!

[zlin08033]

[Shrinkdial]

Honestly.....wow!
Think you got most bases covered....except a destro!!

I love the double chrono 3778, that is a beautiful watch...*drool*

Originally Posted by zlin08033

[robin hood]

I have a Rolex sub, and IWC Portugese, and just recently added a PAM 312. Each serves a different purpose. For cruises and summer fun the blue/gold Rolex fits the requirements. For dress up with cuffs, the IWC is stunning with its gold numerals on a white face. For all else, I like the 312...with short sleeves, sweaters and long sleeves without a sport coat. Now, in terms of keeping time: IWC wins (+1/day, on average), the Rolex second (+3 to +4/day), and the Panerai comes in around +4/day, maybe a bit more, but still measuring. If you only buy one watch, I would say get the IWC (The gold yatchclub is a killer), but if you like to play with watches/straps, etc...the PAM is great fun. My other watches are worn on special occasions as needed. Hope this helps a little.

[Submariner1990]

Originally Posted by zlin08033

so cool, My PAM000 Doesen't compete with all these lol...

[kungpow]

What else do you have in your collection? Based on your post I'd try an IWC - you already have the 005, so why not add some variety?