![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Yorkshire England
Posts: 47
|
Quality of Panerai?
Guys
I am in new watch mode, and am contemplating Rolex, Omega, Panerai. I like the Pam 90 but have concerns about the quality of the product. Are they just a very nice looking, well designed/marketed, yet cheaply manufactured product, or are they the real deal, and will be around for years to come, full of quality materials and movements. Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Bruce Ginsberg
Location: St. Louis MO USA
Watch: Panerai Vintage
Posts: 7,477
|
I think the PAM 90 is a great choice for a first Panerai. The older models that do not have in house movements have proven to be durable and relatively accurate. In my opinion, the PAM 90 is still relatively simple yet unique with the offset power reserve.
My guess is you would be very happy with that model. Good Luck, Bruce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: ACCT CLOSED
Location: -
Posts: 1,497
|
I have 4 of them and feel they are the real deal and will stick around. Some may argue that many of their movements are ETA (6497) and thus inferior, or common. I don't feel that way.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Wing
Location: Calgary,AB,Canada
Watch: the World unfold
Posts: 1,019
|
they are well built for sure and will stick around for the people who knows their watches.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Yorkshire England
Posts: 47
|
Thanks
I'm no purist. I just want something that works well, looks good and isn't a rip off.... What other models would you suggest I look at pls? They're are so many I don't even know where to start... What is the diff for example between the 90 and the 392? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: ACCT CLOSED
Location: -
Posts: 1,497
|
The 90 has a power reserve and a 44mm case, 24mm lugs. The 392 is a 42mm case, 22mm lugs, and no power reserve. The larger case is iconic and would be my choice, although I DO own a 392. There are a lot of PAM's and it can be confusing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,131
|
IMHO all luxury watches are not "worth the money" if you really need the money. That being said, they are called luxury time pieces for a reason. It truly is a luxury to own one or a few or a hundred.
For me, Panerai was a hate at first sight relationship. They all looked the same; the Itilian Navy's history of dominance doesn't impress me; the fact that Sylvester Stalone wears them and seemed to have catapulted them into a world brand doesn't matter to me; on & on & on...... BUT then I started to look into them. Started seeing the difference between the Luminars & the Rads. The 1950 case vs the Historic. The painted / sausage dial vs the sandwich. The date vs no date. The seconds vs the non seconds. The automatic vs the manual wind. The in house movement vs the ETA. The strap vs the bracelet. The power reserve vs the non power reserve. Now I really like Panerai. I respect their history, their damn near extinction, and their different styles and functions. I also like the fact that most people aren't familiar with them. I've actually had more unsolicited comments on my 112 than any other watch. I'm not sure I answered your question. I do think the WIS crowd will always be intriged by the brand & I do think the brand is here for a while. R/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
I just got my hands on one and I'm converted, buy with confidence.
Now that I have a Luminor can't stop thinking about a Radiomir.
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
|
Yes I had a similar relationship with Pams as well.
I hated them at first sight but I've come to terms with the fact that for watches under $10000, you're really paying for design and nice finishing. Not much history or horlogical prowess is available (new) for $10000. Rolex gets close although I think rolex is a fine tool watch so I don't associate it with haute horlogerie. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.