The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 May 2013, 11:55 AM   #1
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Should I make the plunge?

I was offered this:

PICTURE IS NOT MINE, NOR THE WATCH IM INTEREDTED IN



PICTURE IS NOT MINE NOR THE WATCH IM INTERESTED IN

But it's exactly like that.

For 10.5 k usd.

It's in immaculate condition.

The bezel is pristine.

Works fine.

Head only.

Should I?
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2013, 12:13 PM   #2
Vlad
"TRF" Member
 
Vlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 813
A nice condition turn-o-graph would definitely be worth that and more.

but... if any parts are not original (service or aftermarket) the price should drop by A LOT. As with any Rolex sports model from the early 1950s, check 1) all hands, 2) dial, 3) bezel insert, 4) bezel, 5) how polished is the case, 6) pitting on the case, 7) how crisp/clear are the numbers, 8) wear to the lugs, 9) wear to the spring bar holes, .....
Vlad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2013, 12:35 PM   #3
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
1) all hands

All hands in top condition, patina lume, slight corrosion (negligible)

2) dial

Perfect dial with tropical turning potential

3) bezel insert

Best I have ever seen for a 50s watch

4) bezel

Tip top, sharp edges, no dings

5) how polished is the case

Some polished marks, but thick and well maintained

6) pitting on the case

Slight, almost negligible.

7) how crisp/clear are the numbers

As crisp as your potato chip

8) wear to the lugs
Boy - it's thick

9) wear to the spring bar holes
Now this I didn't check!
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2013, 08:31 PM   #4
Darlinboy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Darlinboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DB
Location: :noitacoL
Watch: :hctaW
Posts: 6,701
Sounds like a nice one, but there is just no way to evaluate without pics. As was remarked by Vlad, an original one, in the condition described, would be a very good deal indeed at that price. However, one thing off/not original, and not a good deal at all.

__________________
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Darlinboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2013, 05:34 PM   #5
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Yea I would have to get a more detailed and original pic of it. However Im a bit put iff due to the size. It looks tiny!!
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2013, 07:32 PM   #6
oceandweller
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 461
Go for the refs 1680 or 1665, then

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shade View Post
Yea I would have to get a more detailed and original pic of it. However Im a bit put iff due to the size. It looks tiny!!
If you are after size, I think the mod refs 1680 and 1665 are both: well-proportioned, bold and stunning. No regrets.
oceandweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2013, 12:51 AM   #7
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Yeah I would prefer a red sub I think!
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2013, 03:39 AM   #8
Mark020
"TRF" Member
 
Mark020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,132
Please be aware of one thing: the devil is in the details. And the wrong detail will cost you dearly.
Mark020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2013, 04:33 AM   #9
Mike1066
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16600
Posts: 728
Those watches are tiny. I tried one on once and it was puny on the wrist. Go with a 1680 or 1665 for the money. But, just my humble opinion.

V/R

Mike
__________________
V/R
Mike
Mike1066 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2013, 09:40 AM   #10
oceandweller
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 461
Good decision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shade View Post
Yeah I would prefer a red sub I think!
A sound choice but be wary, since there are lots of frankens and fakes. Do not just pick up anything, you see. Excellent vintage-watch but not easy to get an authentic piece.
oceandweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.