The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 July 2013, 05:10 PM   #1
redsubby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Henry
Location: TW/SoCal
Posts: 1,632
DSSD servicing

My Deepsea is coming up to 5 full years in a few months. When I decide to take it in to local RSC for a full service, will they need to send the watch back to Geneva? The reason I'm asking is because I am not sure if local RSC's have the machines to test its 3900m depth?
From what I read in the magazines, these machines/tanks are in Geneva so how do local RSC's go about testing the deepsea after the service is complete?
redsubby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2013, 06:01 PM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by redsubby View Post
My Deepsea is coming up to 5 full years in a few months. When I decide to take it in to local RSC for a full service, will they need to send the watch back to Geneva? The reason I'm asking is because I am not sure if local RSC's have the machines to test its 3900m depth?
From what I read in the magazines, these machines/tanks are in Geneva so how do local RSC's go about testing the deepsea after the service is complete?
Well although the DSSD uses the cal 3135 easily serviced but because of its rated depth that no man will ever use to the full.To test to its rated depth then its only certain places they can do it like the RSC. But in the real world if any watch passes say a pressure test to around 200-300m it will be fine for all normal water activities scuba pool etc.Do you dive or plan to exceed underwater depths of 300m to get into the exclusive group of guys that have gone past 300m just using scuba,.As today there have been more men that have gone to the moon than have gone past 300m just on scuba. Regarding service if your watch is running fine then myself would go another year before thinking about a service. Unless watch has been used in water a lot or worn 24/7 and used in say a dusty environment.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2013, 08:20 PM   #3
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,991
Why are you feeling need to get it serviced? Is it not running well or not within COSC? Just get a pressure check as Peter said above and save your money on the service!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2013, 08:57 PM   #4
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
Myself I would not worry about a service for seven years on a new watch, a pressure test at any good watchmaker with a Rolex parts account is fine, maybe gaskers are needed and you want original parts with a normal 300m test imho.This will suffice until Rolex service in a few years, they have the necessary equipment to do a full depth test, but it will definetely not leak in the meantine that's for Sure.:thumbup::beer:
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2013, 11:31 PM   #5
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
IIRC some of the RSCs now have the necessary equipment to pressure test to the stated depth so I doubt it'd be shipped back to Rolex SA.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2013, 11:34 PM   #6
gpfps
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
Rolex has the equipment in P.A Rolex center.
gpfps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 02:32 AM   #7
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
the advice as stated by all above is on the money but if possible, can you post pix? if its a 5yr daily wear dssd, i'd love to see how it held up. thanks
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 07:00 AM   #8
redsubby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Henry
Location: TW/SoCal
Posts: 1,632
Thanks all.
The watch runs fine at this moment and probably doesn't require a service right now, I was just curious when it comes to that time, then how does RSC do the pressure test. I wasn't sure if the RSC's have proper equipment to pressure test the Deepsea. I understand that I will never go down that far but if the dial says 3900m, it is also my understanding that Rolex will have to make sure it don't leak at that depth, am I wrong? I mean what's the point of making such a watch if the stated depth rating is only good up until the watch is serviced, then it's the standard 300m-1220m after that?
redsubby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 07:34 AM   #9
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,451
Funny thing, if they pressured tested the watch to 300m and told you that it was good for 3900, no one would ever find out!
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 08:02 AM   #10
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauebm View Post
Funny thing, if they pressured tested the watch to 300m and told you that it was good for 3900, no one would ever find out!
exactly it's really all in the owners head this amazing depth stuff, you will never use it or know any different
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 08:35 AM   #11
jojosnr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 379
your local rsc may have the pressure test chamber. just check with them. and if they don't they shud be able to send your watch to one nearest to you that has. depending on where you are, it may just take a little longer. it is not feasible for every rsc to have the full set of equipment especially specialized ones for niche watches. that's partly why your DSSD is special.


Quote:
Originally Posted by redsubby View Post
Thanks all.
The watch runs fine at this moment and probably doesn't require a service right now, I was just curious when it comes to that time, then how does RSC do the pressure test. I wasn't sure if the RSC's have proper equipment to pressure test the Deepsea. I understand that I will never go down that far but if the dial says 3900m, it is also my understanding that Rolex will have to make sure it don't leak at that depth, am I wrong? I mean what's the point of making such a watch if the stated depth rating is only good up until the watch is serviced, then it's the standard 300m-1220m after that?
jojosnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 01:11 PM   #12
dcash0615
2024 Pledge Member
 
dcash0615's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: CA
Watch: es
Posts: 4,394
I know RSC Dallas has the necessary equipment to test the DSSD watch to the stated depth rating. Actually Rolex watches are tested beyond the stated depth rating. It is my understanding Rolex will not let any timepiece leave the RSC after a service if it does not pass all of their tests. This includes the depth rating.

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsubby View Post
Thanks all.
The watch runs fine at this moment and probably doesn't require a service right now, I was just curious when it comes to that time, then how does RSC do the pressure test. I wasn't sure if the RSC's have proper equipment to pressure test the Deepsea. I understand that I will never go down that far but if the dial says 3900m, it is also my understanding that Rolex will have to make sure it don't leak at that depth, am I wrong? I mean what's the point of making such a watch if the stated depth rating is only good up until the watch is serviced, then it's the standard 300m-1220m after that?
dcash0615 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 04:52 PM   #13
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauebm View Post
Funny thing, if they pressured tested the watch to 300m and told you that it was good for 3900, no one would ever find out!
Exactly and I am 100% sure no member on this forum would ever test it to 200m or 100m in the real world not alone 3900m.If a watch is going to leak it would show on test in most cases around 20m if it leaks then you have a problem. Just like if it leaks at 3900m but at that depth underwater you would be long dead so it would not really matter.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 07:26 PM   #14
ryandavid25
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: David Ryan
Location: Dublin and Dubai
Watch: Rolex GMT 2 16710
Posts: 41
DSSD Servicing, Sucba Dive Table

Hello, as a ex scuba diver I just want to confirm what Peter (padi56) said above. I have enclosed a decompression table that is used by most scuba divers in the world, as you can see the Max depth is 40 meters this is because of the capacity of the Air Tank on your back and the time needed to decompress on the way back up. You get very little bottom time on a normal scuba dive as your breeding rate can be effected by the cold and other things. This is why the bezel on your dive watch only turns one way to stop you increasing your dive time by accident as you can only decrease your time if your bezel is moved by accident during a dive.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Dive_tables_NAUI.jpg (165.4 KB, 239 views)
ryandavid25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 10:18 PM   #15
zeuloa
"TRF" Member
 
zeuloa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
I'm sure RSC will sorted out. If it says 3900 meters on the dial then you have every right to have it tested to that depth!

Good luck.
zeuloa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 10:25 PM   #16
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeuloa View Post
I'm sure RSC will sorted out. If it says 3900 meters on the dial then you have every right to have it tested to that depth!

Good luck.
True but have India on my car tyres but I am not going there.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 03:10 PM   #17
redsubby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Henry
Location: TW/SoCal
Posts: 1,632
I think some of you are missing my point.
Of course none of us will ever go down to 3900m in the water but if it's advertized to go down that far, it had better be that way. And I think Dave was right that RSC will not let a watch leave without proper pressure testing, otherwise they would note the service paper that the watch was not test for whatever reason.
It's not a matter of me actually diving that far down (I don't even dive), but the simple question of if all RSC's have the proper equipment to carry out this test, and if not, what do they do with your Deepsea?
redsubby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 04:25 PM   #18
waterman1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 889
Well said redsubby. Exactly.
waterman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 05:42 PM   #19
jojosnr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 379
i agree with you. I believe if they do not have the equipment, they would just send it to the nearest centre that has.

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsubby View Post
I think some of you are missing my point.
Of course none of us will ever go down to 3900m in the water but if it's advertized to go down that far, it had better be that way. And I think Dave was right that RSC will not let a watch leave without proper pressure testing, otherwise they would note the service paper that the watch was not test for whatever reason.
It's not a matter of me actually diving that far down (I don't even dive), but the simple question of if all RSC's have the proper equipment to carry out this test, and if not, what do they do with your Deepsea?
jojosnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 05:46 PM   #20
jojosnr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 379
yes they could but they wont

Quote:
Originally Posted by kauebm View Post
Funny thing, if they pressured tested the watch to 300m and told you that it was good for 3900, no one would ever find out!
jojosnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 05:50 PM   #21
skprd13
"TRF" Member
 
skprd13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Kauai
Watch: 1675-1680-16750
Posts: 3,346
I would be satisfied at 100m! And I am not sure I would ever see that depth! Actually no I know I would never see that depth. As for service 5 yrs is not a magic number as many have stated is the watch not running to specs? If so wait and save your money for another year or two. Just my 2 cents!
skprd13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 05:55 PM   #22
hao881026
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Irvine, CA, USA
Posts: 7
I hope my reply help this debate to a close, if a watch is pressure tested to 200m or 300m, the rest 300m~ 3900m is rely on the strength of the case and sapphire. Because the higher outside pressure will just make the watch as a whole become tighter. There is no need to actually test actual leak. In another word, good case+good sapphire+ pressure test 300m = pressure test to 3900m

Last edited by hao881026; 3 July 2013 at 05:56 PM.. Reason: Typo
hao881026 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 11:23 PM   #23
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by redsubby View Post
I think some of you are missing my point.
Of course none of us will ever go down to 3900m in the water but if it's advertized to go down that far, it had better be that way. And I think Dave was right that RSC will not let a watch leave without proper pressure testing, otherwise they would note the service paper that the watch was not test for whatever reason.
It's not a matter of me actually diving that far down (I don't even dive), but the simple question of if all RSC's have the proper equipment to carry out this test, and if not, what do they do with your Deepsea?
Exactly how I feel. Who cares if your tires say India but you aren't going, they better be capable of it though. It's irrelevant what I'm going to do with the equipment, but the equipment needs to be capable of what it's sold/purposed for.
Again, just because I weigh 200lbs doesn't mean my climbing rope should be good for 1000lbs, if it says 8500lbs, that's what I expect.
Further more, let's say you get one of these boot leg tests for 100m, and your Deepsea leaks and you take it to RSC and show them the paper work that says it was tested for 100m, I'm pretty sure they'd say the watch wasn't calibrated to factory specs and that's why it leaked, now pay up. What will you say, the guys on TRF said it was ok though.

To me, if the watch says 3900m on the dial that's what it better be rated and tested at by the manufacturer and what the watch's maintenance requires. Everyone keeps talking about the practical application....like every single person here is a pilot with their GMTs, or Yachting with their YM, or racing with their Daytonas, or even Irish with their Sub LVc.
You're going to tell me that if you own a Veyron that you're going to forego that it requires $30k tires because hey, you're never going to hit 200mph right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hao881026 View Post
I hope my reply help this debate to a close, if a watch is pressure tested to 200m or 300m, the rest 300m~ 3900m is rely on the strength of the case and sapphire. Because the higher outside pressure will just make the watch as a whole become tighter. There is no need to actually test actual leak. In another word, good case+good sapphire+ pressure test 300m = pressure test to 3900m
This is a theory, but not logical at all. The Deepsea doesn't get it's rating solely by compression. In fact the reason it has a titanium back is to help the case flex from the pressure, were it steel it would likely crack. It's not an SR-71 Blackbird. So NO, a 300m pressure test does not equal 3900m. In fact it has been shown that in many cases Rolex test it's watches beyond the rated depth.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2013, 01:21 PM   #24
Billywiz
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Watch: YG President
Posts: 2,090
My car says 160mph poss....aint goin there...
Billywiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2013, 06:12 AM   #25
WatchnRoll
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 538
I paid for 3900m and I want it! lol

I'll never use it but when I send mine in for service...it better be tested to the fullest.

Those service bills aren't cheap.
__________________
Navitimer 01 on Black Leather Strap
WatchnRoll is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.