ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 January 2008, 03:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Hien Q Pham
Location: Orlando, FL
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 595
|
GMT II or Submariner?
Everyone Hope you can help me out here. Do you prefer the GMT II or Sub? BTW, how about the newer GMT II comparing to the older model? I was thinking about the following, but undecided right now:
1. Submariner date with black bezel 2. Submariner BLUE bezel/face 3. GMT II stainless (older/newer style) 4. GMT II two-tone (older/newer style) Looking to get at least one soon. The second in March, my BDay For some reason, I'm more attached to the newer GMT II two-tone more nowdays. A little big on my wrist, but it's a mean looking watch. Help me out...thanks, ~Hien |
19 January 2008, 04:11 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 40
|
I've long liked the GMT series, but didn't care for the small crown. I think the latest incarnation has the larger crown? A great all-around watch with a proven movt. imho.
__________________
Interested in economics, watches, or fountain pens? http://amateureconblog.blogspot.com/ http://twitter.com/speedmaster |
19 January 2008, 04:16 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
Based on your fabulous collection you recently shared with us, and your penchant for gold, I would say the 116713.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
19 January 2008, 04:21 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Leighton
Location: So. California
Watch: SS GMT IIc
Posts: 1,366
|
x2
|
19 January 2008, 04:22 AM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,939
|
Maybe this will help with the GMT's!!!!
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN |
19 January 2008, 04:26 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
|
I love both, but the new GMT just sang to me when it was time to buy. I will for sure have a Submariner in the not-too-distant future. You can't go wrong either way, IMO.
|
19 January 2008, 04:45 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
|
decisions....decisions....
You could always flip a coin.....
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
19 January 2008, 04:59 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: az
Posts: 283
|
ss gmt2
|
19 January 2008, 05:01 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
Likely to have changes to the Sub this spring and those changes are generally thought to be for the better.
The GMT-IIC already has those changes. Yes, the new GMT-IIC has the triple lock (big) crown from the Sub now. If you can't wait to see what shakes out on the Sub, buy a GMT-IIC. It's a more flexible watch anyway. TT if you think you might wear it in dressy situations. Go SS if it's a pure casual wear watch. Lots of opinions. My two cents... |
19 January 2008, 05:23 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Alexander
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Watch: GMT Master II SS
Posts: 425
|
Quote:
First GMT IIc Second GMT II with black/red bezel Last Sub I skip out TT GMT II all together because I don't like gold on sport watch. As you know, it is very hard to take care of gold for normal usage. |
|
19 January 2008, 05:25 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 739
|
I would go with the GMT II SS.
|
19 January 2008, 06:45 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ardmore
Posts: 74
|
I would go with the ss gmt II non ceramic. I am not a big fan of some of the updates on the new gmt (center links, bigger numbers of bezel). If you love the sub, wait untill basel to see what might happen, like me.
|
19 January 2008, 06:54 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,175
|
Go to an AD, try them on, and then YOU tell us. Every example is a winner.
Good luck, dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
19 January 2008, 07:05 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 248
|
The only objection to the GMTIIc that I am aware of is some objection to the shininess of the polished center links, larger white-gold hands and indices and the shininess of the bezel, as compared to the old aluminum bezels.
In my opinion, the watch is tasteful and less flashy than the big 45 mm Panerais and Omegas that seem to be. I was looking at the Sub, but I ended up getting this instead after evaluating the comparative merits and the significant improvements that have been made to this watch. A lot of purists object to the lack of the red and blue bezel, which is traditional for the watch. I like the look of the black ceramic bezel. I think it wears better with a suit than the red/blue would. |
19 January 2008, 07:30 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Vukota Brajovi
Location: Belgrade,Serbia
Watch: ing movies!
Posts: 3,812
|
For me TT Blue Sub is most beautiful Rolex by far.And GMT Pepsi folows it.
|
19 January 2008, 07:31 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
I'd go for the SS GMT IIc due to the updates (better bracelet/clasp and new movement). Also, it looks very much like a Sub Date.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
19 January 2008, 04:40 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joseph
Location: NORCAL
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 166
|
U can't be wrong on both watches
|
19 January 2008, 04:42 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,999
|
I think I caught a rare shot of the OP
In all seriousness, I think the gold GMT-Master II Ceramic, would fit right in with your collection of YG Rolex watches. |
19 January 2008, 04:58 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7
|
GMT II or Daytona
Don't mean to hijack the thread, but on the same note I am thinking of a Rolesor GMT II or Daytona with black face. I have a SS Sub so am a little worried with the GMT it might be too similar. I tried on a GMT today and almost bought it on the spot. That new bezel is awesome. Do you think the difference in the sub and the 2 tone GMT would be enough or would I just have 2 of the same watch? I have a TAG SS link chrono, the Sub SS, Gold B-1 and a PAM 112. I need a 2 tone! Thanks for any input.
|
25 January 2008, 12:17 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: PHILIPPINES
Posts: 3
|
sub date black dial:)
|
25 January 2008, 12:37 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
SUBDATE first, than for GMT II Pepsi...
|
25 January 2008, 12:41 AM | #22 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Quote:
If you really like tt, I think go for Daytona tt white face. Such a beautiful watch. Just my opinion, Mate. |
|
25 January 2008, 12:42 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
|
All watches mentioned are great. I think it boils down to whether you like the updated supercase, maxi dial, solid bracelet with polished center links, etc, or not. Then I would choose based on the functionality of each watch. Good luck.
__________________
Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.