ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dysondiver · 30 September 2013, 06:42 AM

i actually quite like the top sub ,,,
would i pay the price ,, no

lamnyc · 30 September 2013, 07:21 AM

Have you try Rollieforums?

kieselguhr · 30 September 2013, 07:34 AM

I wouldn't wear one. Probably because I couldn't afford one

But I wont knock it if I haven't tried it. Some of the watches that are are generally considered gnarly look nice live.

Runnin' Rebel · 30 September 2013, 07:45 AM

Still think they should've made an LVc with diamond hour markers

Haters gonna hate ...

Israguard · 30 September 2013, 08:07 AM

I like them both.. The first one a bit more. I think (imho) that what makes these models more "balanced" is that there are no diamond on the lugs. I saw some other super blinged gold models from Rolex.. That famous Filipino boxer wears one.. Diamond in all the colors everywhere, but they extended then to the lugs which I personally don't care for.

jctrolex · 30 September 2013, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogiebot

I totally agree. Personally not my style but you have to give credit in terms of setting these stones on stainless steel. From my understanding it's much harder than setting in gold.

I thought they are WG?

Stellite · 30 September 2013, 12:44 PM

nice rollies!!!

eeh100773 · 30 September 2013, 01:30 PM

Neither are up my alley - price notwithstanding , of course. Is it me, or would telling the time on the second Sub be difficult?

jot_ · 30 September 2013, 01:32 PM

I saw the first one in the window at an AD in Toronto about a year ago. In fact, all they had were the blinged out models in the window. This was before I bought my first Rolex... needless to say, it put me off from buying one for a little while (though not that long!)

james1787 · 30 September 2013, 02:03 PM

The first one isn't bad.. I'm not sure if I could pull off wearing it but I do like it.

boogiebot · 30 September 2013, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jctrolex

I thought they are WG?

Hahahah shows how much I know.

SUBversive · 30 September 2013, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjnd08

I'm guessing the people that wear those would call them "Rollies;" and therefore, wouldn't visit this site! Haha

Hairdude1 · 30 September 2013, 02:38 PM

Not a fan of either

peacemaker1ps · 30 September 2013, 02:47 PM

Bling Blang!

mikkolopez · 30 September 2013, 05:28 PM

I gotta wear shades just looking at the pictures.

Baronrojo · 30 September 2013, 05:32 PM

To each his own I guess.

30 September 2013, 07:45 AM	#34
Runnin' Rebel "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Mark Location: 🤔 Posts: 8,424	Still think they should've made an LVc with diamond hour markers Haters gonna hate ... __________________ ♛

30 September 2013, 06:42 AM	#31
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	i actually quite like the top sub ,,, would i pay the price ,, no

30 September 2013, 07:21 AM	#32
lamnyc "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: nyc Posts: 1,762	Have you try Rollieforums?

30 September 2013, 07:34 AM	#33
kieselguhr "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Nick Location: Las Vegas Watch: 1601 Posts: 10,616	I wouldn't wear one. Probably because I couldn't afford one But I wont knock it if I haven't tried it. Some of the watches that are are generally considered gnarly look nice live.

30 September 2013, 08:07 AM	#35
Israguard "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Montreal Posts: 859	I like them both.. The first one a bit more. I think (imho) that what makes these models more "balanced" is that there are no diamond on the lugs. I saw some other super blinged gold models from Rolex.. That famous Filipino boxer wears one.. Diamond in all the colors everywhere, but they extended then to the lugs which I personally don't care for.

30 September 2013, 12:44 PM	#37
Stellite "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Dennis Location: Colorado Watch: 16600 Posts: 338	nice rollies!!!

30 September 2013, 01:30 PM	#38
eeh100773 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: "Fast" Eddie Location: Asbury Park NJ Watch: 14060 T Series '96 Posts: 1,482	Neither are up my alley - price notwithstanding , of course. Is it me, or would telling the time on the second Sub be difficult?

30 September 2013, 01:32 PM	#39
jot_ "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Toronto, ON Watch: Explorer I 214270 Posts: 310	I saw the first one in the window at an AD in Toronto about a year ago. In fact, all they had were the blinged out models in the window. This was before I bought my first Rolex... needless to say, it put me off from buying one for a little while (though not that long!)

30 September 2013, 02:03 PM	#40
james1787 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: James Location: New Providence,NJ Watch: Submariner 14060 Posts: 2,371	The first one isn't bad.. I'm not sure if I could pull off wearing it but I do like it.

30 September 2013, 02:38 PM	#43
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Not a fan of either

30 September 2013, 02:47 PM	#44
peacemaker1ps "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: SOCAL Watch: SUB-C Posts: 14	Bling Blang!

30 September 2013, 05:28 PM	#45
mikkolopez "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Philippines Posts: 2,301	I gotta wear shades just looking at the pictures.

30 September 2013, 05:32 PM	#46
Baronrojo "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: CA Watch: Rolex Posts: 267	To each his own I guess.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)