Explorer I vs. Aqua Terra

[fisherman79]

Originally Posted by TimeOnMyHands

Interesting. That is how I ended up feeling about all of my Omega's. Glad I am not alone in regards.

Omega actually only left 1 real icon, that's the Ploprof.
The speedmaster was an icon of Omega, but to me because of the design and dial layout (too big, only 2 registers for the chrono, date) its not an icon anymore.

All other models still have the same family names, but are not actually related anymore.

[sncarney18]

Originally Posted by fisherman79

Omega actually only left 1 real icon, that's the Ploprof.
The speedmaster was an icon of Omega, but to me because of the design and dial layout (too big, only 2 registers for the chrono, date) its not an icon anymore.

All other models still have the same family names, but are not actually related anymore.

The Speedmaster Professional is still made. It has the classic 3 dials and is still manual wind. Only the 9300 movement has the two dials.

[fisherman79]

Originally Posted by sncarney18

The Speedmaster Professional is still made. It has the classic 3 dials and is still manual wind. Only the 9300 movement has the two dials.

Yes I know, but its too big with 42mm.
The original had 39 and later it became 40.

[blackout]

Exp

[serdal22]

If I have to choose between an Omega and Rolex, I would go with a drilled lugs GMT II Pepsi.

If I have to get an Omega, it will be the new Seamaster PO GMT Good Planet second hand, not new. I handled the Orange PO at my Omega Boutique (The ceramic insert has the orange numbers) two weeks ago, and my jaw dropped!

Now your case . . . I would go with either second hand AT, or an Explorer I either new or old. I bought a new Seamaster GMT, and later I decided to let it go to get another incoming. I lost an arm and leg despite wearing it two or three times only, and its price never increased in two years.

Whichever model sings for you, go for it.

Capt. Serdal

[SearChart]

Explorer I 36mm is my favourite Rolex watch, I'd pick it over any Omega.

[swils8610]

Rolex for sure. Holds value the best also.


Rolex 16610
Rolex 216570 Polar
Rolex 116400GV

[Jack T]

I have a Planet Ocean 2500, really like it, the fit, feel, performance and aesthetics, so I am ok with the Omega brand. Had considered the AT very seriously, I think it is a very well made watch, the 8500 movement is excellent, has been out there long enough now to conclude it is pretty reliable and as good as expected. But, in the meantime I bought an Explorer I, so...

[damoos91]

for the record, I currently have a speedmaster, my best friend has a datejust and my stepfather has a railmaster. all are amazing watches but i want something that no one around me has.

[warrior]

Well, here's the thing. I have both an AT 8500 Skyfall and the EXP 39MM ( and had the 36MM). You're on TRF, which means that there's already a bias and that the majority ( not all) haven't tried on the AT, and simply rely on the Rolex name, their familiarity and love of the brand, and brand image to give their suggestion.

I'd say the AT 8500. Great quality. Modern, more technically advanced movement and there's so much more depth and detail to the dial. It's a much more interesting, more 3 ' dimensional' piece in terms of aesthetics. I really like the Exp but love the AT 8500.

Originally Posted by damoos91

for the record, I currently have a speedmaster, my best friend has a datejust and my stepfather has a railmaster. all are amazing watches but i want something that no one around me has.

[Chainring]

Originally Posted by damoos91

for the record, I currently have a speedmaster, my best friend has a datejust and my stepfather has a railmaster. all are amazing watches but i want something that no one around me has.

Get a Glashutte Original 60s then. You don't see them much and in my opinion they are unbelievable watches. I don't own one, but I would like to change that.

Originally Posted by warrior

Well, here's the thing. I have both an AT 8500 Skyfall and the EXP 39MM ( and had the 36MM). You're on TRF, which means that there's already a bias and that the majority ( not all) haven't tried on the AT, and simply rely on the Rolex name, their familiarity and love of the brand, and brand image to give their suggestion.

I'd say the AT 8500. Great quality. Modern, more technically advanced movement and there's so much more depth and detail to the dial. It's a much more interesting, more 3 ' dimensional' piece in terms of aesthetics. I really like the Exp but love the AT 8500.

I tried to buy an AT Skyfall 8500 about a month back and the deal fell through. I still regret that very much. I think that deep blue dial is incredible. But if you want something that will hold it's value, an Explorer is a solid bet.

[polarinda]

eventhough not my fav but the exp 1 39mm is still a very classy watch.

[BeekerMuppet]

The AT gets my vote. Very nice watch