The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 October 2013, 06:49 PM   #1
LForryan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Posts: 4
Confused about date of my Rolex

So my Dad recently gave me a vintage Rolex of his (pictured below).

The model number is 6569 and the serial number is 356867.

After checking a number of charts this serial number implies it is a 1945 watch, however after some research my watch seems to resemble the later 1950 Oyster perpetuals, not any 1945 watch. Could anybody help shed some light upon when this watch was made or any other information? Thanks









LForryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2013, 09:16 PM   #2
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
Hi there, welcome aboard!

In 1953, Rolex reached 999,999 then started over again at 10,000. Yours should be circa 1958.
__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2013, 09:22 PM   #3
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcan View Post
Hi there, welcome aboard!

In 1953, Rolex reached 999,999 then started over again at 10,000. Yours should be circa 1958.
Agreed^

The serial reset in the 1950s really causes problems for folks.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2013, 10:38 PM   #4
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
Great watch, hope you continue to participate in TRF.
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2013, 11:47 PM   #5
LForryan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Posts: 4
Thanks for the replies everybody!

After some googling of the serial number reset I've determined that it must be a 1955 model which finally makes sense.

I'm really happy with this present from Dad as it's my first vintage watch! He'll also be happy to know that I finally have some information about it because he had no clue when it was made or anything.
LForryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2013, 11:54 PM   #6
LForryan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Posts: 4
One more question, just out of interest, how much would the watch be worth nowadays? I'd love to know my new watch's value..
LForryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2013, 12:22 AM   #7
marcello pisani
"TRF" Member
 
marcello pisani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 991
no a case in the 356.XXX range was ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by LForryan View Post
Thanks for the replies everybody!

After some googling of the serial number reset I've determined that it must be a 1955 model which finally makes sense.

I'm really happy with this present from Dad as it's my first vintage watch! He'll also be happy to know that I finally have some information about it because he had no clue when it was made or anything.
produced at the very beginning of 1958 ( certainly in the 1st quarter ) as for ex. is also previous to 5510 ( that have case numbers above 360.000 ).
don't thrust too much in the tables you " freely " find on the net ..
marcello pisani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2013, 12:25 AM   #8
LForryan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Posts: 4
Oh okay, thanks for the info. Didn't stop to think that those serial number tables might be wrong.

It's nice to finally have some expert knowledge instead of relying on my pitiful attempts at googling the information.
LForryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2013, 12:53 AM   #9
marcello pisani
"TRF" Member
 
marcello pisani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 991
the problem is that ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by LForryan View Post
Oh okay, thanks for the info. Didn't stop to think that those serial number tables might be wrong.

It's nice to finally have some expert knowledge instead of relying on my pitiful attempts at googling the information.
tables you find on the net are made by collectors/experts /dealers and are based on what they have seen and for old watches almost rely on the production date of the backs ( that are in fact punched inside ).
moeover ( as already written above ) the " reset " of case numbers made at the beginning of 1954 has created further confusion.
very very few people have " internal " production tables that on the contrary are correct ( as based on internal factory informations ) but are not allowed to share them ( and in fact they have never been published ).
so if you ask .. I can well answer you with the correct year of production but I can't share the tables.
marcello pisani is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.