![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 2,686
|
Going round in circles now
Still contemplating my next purchase
![]() Gone full circle. Was originally thinking AP diver then looked again at rolex followed by Zenith now back onto AP. Tried on day/date + diver today never considered DD before but I must say I loved the balance of the dial. Anyway loved them both although both completely different watches. Thoughts welcome guys ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 2,686
|
Sorry forgot the Diver
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,260
|
They look nice, but neither has crossed my mind.
Personally, I feel the RO is nicer when it's more simple like the 15202/15400, so I feel the dual circles throws off the look (same reason I don't love the ROC). As for the Diver, it's the opposite where I feel a ROO should be a bit more complex, so in this case it's a bit too simple. Both look nice, just my personal thoughts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,260
|
Between the 2, the DD does seem to look nicer on your wrist though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
I love the diver. I wear almost all the time. I do like the look of the DD. Tough call
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
![]()
The DD seems more symmetrical on your wrist.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Jimmy
Location: La Crescenta
Watch: AP Diver
Posts: 808
|
i just got the diver too and wear it all the time. even to bed! lol. good luck
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Diver...and check out the FC Diver as well...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: ...
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,466
|
The DD looks great - more so than the diver, IMHO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I like the Diver far more, not such a fan of the Owl.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
They both look great! Difficult decision.... The Diver is a bigger piece.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Geert
Location: Belgium
Watch: rolex/JLC/panerai
Posts: 5,612
|
Both lovely watches Kev. I would take both
![]() The Diver looks more sporty (and it does look marvellous on a bracelet too !) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Sebastien
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 788
|
DD for me, for the SS bracelet and for the dressier dial.
But i also like the Diver |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 2,686
|
Quote:
![]() Its going to be difficult enough telling the wife i need one more watch never mind two ![]() ![]() Yes i have seen pics here on the forum of the diver on bracelet and it does look very nice but i have to say after trying yesterday the rubber stap is so comfortable on the wrist By the way i was told yesterday AP are phasing out the 39mm pieces can anyone confirm this ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 2,686
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
|
Quote:
I like the diver better- to me the design fits in with the original RO design. The 2 subdials in the OWL seem like they would be better suited to a dress watch, like a JLC or PP. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
Now that is funny!
![]() I'm afraid I'll have to disagree with you on that one though my friend, as much as I like the Diver the Day-Date would win this match for me. I do enjoy looking at a simple RO and this one has indeed a busier dial but at the same time I find the display of the complications pretty nice. As far as I'm concerned I'd rather get the model with the moonphase indicator as well but otherwise it's still a good choice to me. ![]()
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I'd go for the diver. I think both look good on your wrist.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,925
|
I like the DD a lot.
Diver too, but prefer the sleeker look of the DD. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX