ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 March 2014, 06:44 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
Battle of the Dwellers!
Well, the new SD 116600 has certainly caused a stir!
In my time on this forum, I don’t think I have ever seen anything quite like this! With every watch, there are people that are big fans, people that don’t like it, and people that are not terribly fussed either way. But the new SD has created a new dimension, it’s suddenly got all competitive and all the current Dweller owners are coming out fighting! The owners of the old SD 16600 are standing by their watches and questioning the bling factor and size of the new model. The owners of the DSSD are claiming that the DSSD is the daddy of dive watches and throwing stones at Desk Divers for daring to suggest that the DSSD is too big. The fans of the new SD 116600 are coming out fighting, suggesting that you have to be a supersize chap to wear a DSSD and that it’s the ugly duckling of the Rolex line-up. I say, Chill the chuff out! I have an SD 16600 and I love it! It works really well on the bracelet, rubber, a Nato, and it’s currently looking mighty fine on a bund. I can wear it for work, down the pub, and when I’m in the garden; I cannot think of a more versatile watch and I like it above and beyond the Sub because I have never seen another in the wild. I would love to own the DSSD because I personally think it looks the nuts; however, I do think it is too big for a chap with mincy arms and mincy wrists (that will be me then) so despite many times considering it, I have never purchased. There are lots of people my size on here that do wear one and think it looks ok, that’s their call, I don’t personally agree but then again I think Crocs look stupid and yet the rest of the world disagrees with me, so who the heck am I to judge. I have ordered the new SD 116600 because it ticks all the boxes for me, combining the best of the SubC and the old SD 16600; it’s not trying to be the DSSD, it is simply a modern version of the SD 16600, people shouldn’t work too hard to compare them just because they both have Dweller in the name. I shall be keeping my SD 16600 because I love it, and it will still have a place at weekends, but I shall wear the new SD for work because it has a little more wrist presence than the old. The new SD 116600 is an brilliant watch and will be in extremely high demand, of that there is no doubt…if you guys prefer your older model or the DSSD then that’s cool, they are different watches. And hey guys, it’s ok to like more than one version! I love all three.
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
27 March 2014, 06:58 PM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Quote:
I prefer brunettes to blondes, but I have to admit........Kate Upton is awful pretty as well
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
|
27 March 2014, 06:59 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Have to agree - lots of people will have their own view and opinions on the new SD. Already, some are showing some disappointment with it but each to his/her own!
I was never too sure about the SubC as I felt it had perhaps moved too far from the tool watch look towards the 'bling' look, athough its still a mightly piece of engineering! Some will no doubt say that the new SD is too close to the SubC in overall looks and that it was a relatively easy transition for Rolex to turn it out. Maybe so, however I think a lot of people will still go for it, me being one of them. I'll still keep my 16600 though! The marketing people at Rolex know what they are doing and have no doubt got their sums right here. We should know in any event over the next few months and no doubt this will be a big talking point! |
28 March 2014, 07:16 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
|
Quote:
|
|
28 March 2014, 07:23 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Yep, way too many 'size' and 'lug' discussions already
Not sure how Rolex divers are 'blingy'. All that's really changed is the bezel insert, and the ceramic better natches the dial finish Anyway, time to think of some silly nicknames for the new models...
__________________
|
28 March 2014, 07:32 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.