ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 April 2014, 02:36 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: World
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 855
|
I have a 16610LN and 16570 Polar, the same 2 watches you are considering. I acquired the Sub first, but it has not been on my wrist much at all since I bought the 16570! 16570's 2 time zones are very useful when I travel, it doesn't scream Rolex, and it's definitely more comfortable IMO.
That said, if I had to keep one… it would be the 16610 Sub, because it's THE ICON which I've always wanted and loved. Good luck! Can't go wrong either way. |
2 April 2014, 03:29 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 1,180
|
Why were you hardly wearing the sub in the first place? You mention your issue might be because a few of your friends have subs. If that's the case why go back to it? Get the explorer II, it's not as common as the sub.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
2 April 2014, 04:03 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Hard to argue with the iconic success of the Submariner. Something to consider however is the Explorer never having produced in precious metal has remained purpose built.
|
2 April 2014, 04:53 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 140
|
for an only watch a sub (16610) for a 2nd, 3rd watch and ExII.
|
4 April 2014, 05:58 AM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Berkshire, UK
Watch: 16610, 16013
Posts: 362
|
Quote:
You be better off just going into any high street Rolex AD and trying one on, most of them in London (Bond St/Oxford St/Old Bond St etc) have a Exp2 in stock.
__________________
Plus, Tudor Black Bay 'Black Rose' Tutima 1941 Fliegerchronograph 18ct |
|
4 April 2014, 07:59 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: "Fast" Eddie
Location: Asbury Park NJ
Watch: 14060 T Series '96
Posts: 1,482
|
Good luck in your decision making process. 👍👍
And for the record: the Sub may be the most popular model out there - but to put it into perspective, consider this: I was at a get together a few weekends ago, about 10 of us wearing Rolexes/APs. Mine was the only Sub. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram: @clocksontherocks |
4 April 2014, 08:08 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 16710LN,PO 8900
Posts: 227
|
Have you ever considered the GMT master II 16710? In my very personal opinion, it has a bit of both: the shiny dents and presence of the sub and the same movement as the EXII, 3185, which has that gorgeous red hand! Also this one can be disguised with 3 different bezels. Lug holes and SEL seems a common recommendation in this forum.
Happy hunting!!! |
4 April 2014, 09:55 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,500
|
GMT II does split the difference nicely.
__________________
Time and tide wait for no man. |
4 April 2014, 10:41 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 513
|
I have a SubC and am now wanting the polar Exp2. I just wish I could buy a glide lock clasp to put on the Exp2 bracelet.
|
4 April 2014, 12:07 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,139
|
Funny I see more omegas than subs.
|
4 April 2014, 12:18 PM | #41 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,660
|
Sub ... it's iconic
|
4 April 2014, 04:35 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
|
I have a Sub C and an Explorer II (older version). Whilst the Exp2 came first, the Sub C is a better watch overall - it is stunning to look at.
I will always keep my Exp2, but the Sub C is the best watch in the world. I say go the Sub |
4 April 2014, 04:59 PM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Far Nth QLD
Watch: SubC & Tudor BBR
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD |
|
4 April 2014, 05:13 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
The Sub is for sure the more popular if not most popular model, but for a good reason. The most versatile in the Rolex lineup IMO along side the Explorer. I definitely like both references but between the Explorer II and Sub I'd choose Submariner. Loved the LVC so much I bought it twice
__________________
Instagram @cwin |
4 April 2014, 07:17 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
Have you considered the black dial at all?
|
4 April 2014, 09:57 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: the Burgh
Watch: coupla subs & GMT
Posts: 134
|
Sub or Explorer II
Seems to me that you got rid of the sub originally for work issues and not watch issues. If there's a gnawing feeling in the back of your mind, go with the sub. Unlike other models, you have many choices. Ceramic, Date, no date, LV, precious metal....my 2c's.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
5 April 2014, 04:04 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Explorer II 16550
Posts: 1,401
|
Just purchased an Explorer Ii 16550 Black Dial 9 million serial number serviced this past Jan with service papers and 10 months of Rolex Waranty left. Love everything about the watch especially the second time zone. I looked at a Sub but the Explorer II won out. Got a great deal as well as a more than fair trade in price on my Oysterdate.
|
5 April 2014, 06:30 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: L.A., Calif.
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 2,220
|
Follow your heart and not your head.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
5 April 2014, 06:42 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 32
|
Both are fantastic, but the Sub C is amazing.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.