|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 June 2014, 11:27 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow, UK
Watch: 16570
Posts: 909
|
Sub C vs SDc thickness
Does anyone have any side by sides showing the difference in thickness between the SubC and the new SDc. I have seen a few side by sides of the dials but not really comparing thickness. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
28 June 2014, 11:28 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 1665 GreatWhite SD
Posts: 1,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 June 2014, 04:30 AM
|
#3 |
|
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,657
|
Neither link really allows for a decent comparison. Does anyone have dimensions?
|
|
|
|
29 June 2014, 06:16 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow, UK
Watch: 16570
Posts: 909
|
Thanks for the links. The SDc seems to look a lot thicker in those pictures however it is hard to tell. As post above says does anyone have dimensions or a more detailed side by side. I am trying to decide if the SDc would be too bulky for daily wear much like the Deep Sea is.
|
|
|
|
|
29 June 2014, 06:33 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Watch: changes depending
Posts: 800
|
Thank you for asking this question. If anyone knows, I would also like to know the difference in weight.
|
|
|
|
|
29 June 2014, 07:04 AM
|
#6 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
For me at a thickness of 14ish mm the SDc should be 42mm, it's like an AP ROO.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
