ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 August 2014, 09:11 PM | #31 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 22,490
|
I don't know why I am biased against quartz watches. I guess becoming a WIS and enjoying the artistry of the automatic movements has really caused me to consider quartz watches a shortcut or cop out. There is nothing wrong with them. It just comes down to personal preference.
|
9 August 2014, 05:36 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Asad A. Awan
Location: kabul, Afghanista
Watch: Tissot PRX
Posts: 2,698
|
There is great convenience and some piece of mind to be had in owning quartz watches...I have a few,none omegas though, but I wear them for more active things and just occasionally taking one out and not needing to wind or set is a great luxury...would love to own an x33. and a 2221.80 bond quartz, two watches I have loved a lot...but I will always have an auto or hand wound to enjoy.and remember What I truly love about watchmaking...quartz is more of a purpose based object,that also looks beautiful if well designed, but mechanical is more 'artistic',so to speak... both have their place in a collection. :)
|
9 August 2014, 05:37 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Asad A. Awan
Location: kabul, Afghanista
Watch: Tissot PRX
Posts: 2,698
|
Peace of mind *
|
9 August 2014, 05:46 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
seriously, way to funny, like you see any of that with a solid case back, like on all Rolex's.....99.99999999999999999% of people could not tell the difference in the quartz and mechanical Omega's
|
14 August 2014, 02:37 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 16223 DJ
Posts: 141
|
OP Update:
Sorry have been off this forum for a while. I completely agree with most of the sentiments shared here and appreciate them. What really intrigued me to start the thread was when I saw that Rolex used to make Quartz and even Patek! That was when I didn't know that Quartz, in the 70-80's, represented the "future" of watches at that time. Not so much anymore.
I was at Tourneau (never go there; they screw you over and have horrible CS) and saw a few Co-Axial Omegas with exhibition backs. Completely beautiful and intricate. But now the real question -- Does a modified Swiss ETA on an OMEGA or TAG really cost $2 worth of circuitry?? Or even $30? I'd think that a Swiss ETA would be a little higher quality than a Japanese ETA on any common watch, like a low end Seiko. P.S. -- I realize that my original post was kinda dumb in retrospect. Still kind of a newb to automatics, but now that I own 5-6 autos, I can see the appeal. But one of them crapped out lately so an overhaul is going to be costly... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.