ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 August 2014, 01:12 AM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Canada
Watch: Polar Explorer II
Posts: 1,231
|
Quote:
However the 'rules' of dressing formally are a lot more relaxed now than in my father's day. |
|
29 August 2014, 01:13 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
I tend towards the more traditional approach so can appreciate where the OP is coming from. That being the case, the most traditional approach would be no watch at all.
That said, on the rare occasion I find myself donning my monkey suit I usually use it as an excuse to wear my grandfather's old watch, a vintage 50's YG Hamilton. While I personally go more traditional I can certainly accept that the "rules of engagement" for accessorizing formal attire have loosened up, and it's more of an anything goes type thing when it comes to the timepiece. A Breitling Emergency might be a bit much but a Sub is seen as perfectly acceptable in many quarters. Really, unless the crowd in attendance is composed of truly well-heeled blue-bloods and the affair is a career builder type thing, going with whatever fits your style seems more acceptable these days. I find it kind of funny though when people get all caught up in wearing the perfectly appropriate watch to a black tie affair when at many of these things a good percentage of the attendees are in rented clothes and shoes to begin with.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
29 August 2014, 01:18 AM | #33 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
|
I'm afraid that things like; responsibility for ones actions, good taste and manners, and even a good moral compass, have become Paleo in todays cliche' world, as well as traditions that were passed down for decades.
You are liable to see anything at a black tie event today - black converse tennies, untucked shirts, cuffs flapping in the breeze, bizarre colors or patterns, ostentatious jewelery (on both men and women), and no tie at all... I admit that I do wear a watch to the several formal ocassions I attend each year, usually a vintage Omega or Patek on leather that fits nicely under a cuff. I have to say that I see almost everybody with a watch of some sort on at these affairs, again, few are tasteful, but I do appreciate it when I see somebody that has taken some time and thought in his attire and surroundings..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
29 August 2014, 01:28 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
Quote:
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
|
29 August 2014, 01:43 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Canada
Watch: Polar Explorer II
Posts: 1,231
|
I don't think that we're seeing 'the general deterioration of society' so much as the evolution of fashion. Evolution just happens. I wonder what our descendants will have to say 100 years from now?
|
29 August 2014, 01:54 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I'd just wear your watch and have a good time. Honestly no one would even care.
__________________
Instagram @cwin |
29 August 2014, 11:55 AM | #37 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,845
|
So - no watch with a Dinner Suit.
What about " No 'phone" ? (what have you observed in real life?) My observation is that 99% of people are so addicted to their 'phones that they have them in the shower, let alone at formal events.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
29 August 2014, 12:02 PM | #38 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Who cares?
Location: Texas
Watch: A few
Posts: 451
|
Suit is ok, but not a tux
Quote:
Good Lord! Get a life! Facebook is not living. Very sad. |
|
29 August 2014, 12:41 PM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Very Far Away
Posts: 579
|
|
29 August 2014, 12:48 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Judy
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116234 - 14060M
Posts: 4,607
|
Don't bother wearing your watch because in all reality, you most likely will have your phone hidden and in silent mode. Just check your phone for the time.
Etiquette be damned. |
29 August 2014, 01:40 PM | #41 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: New York, NY
Watch: 16750 matte dial
Posts: 294
|
Quote:
Seconded! Although the consensus here seems to say no watch, I think a JLC Master Ultra Thin or even a Grande Reverso Ultra Thin Tribute to 1931 would be great. |
|
29 August 2014, 04:54 PM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
Tux = no watch. That's why I don't attend black tie affairs! Well, also because I'm never invited to any.. |
|
29 August 2014, 06:28 PM | #43 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,845
|
Some of you guys would attend lots more formal events than me - I'm betting that whilst some might not wear a watch, they would bloody-well make sure they had their phone.
What have you observed?
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.