|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Get rid of Sub C for PAM 233? | |||
| PAM PAM PAM PAM PAM! |
   
|
44 | 52.38% |
| Keep Sub C and stop looking at PAM Enablers! |
  
|
40 | 47.62% |
| Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
2 December 2014, 12:29 AM
|
#31 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NY, US
Posts: 531
|
Get the Pam...rolex sub c is always around and you can get it anytime.
|
|
|
|
2 December 2014, 08:20 AM
|
#32 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: france
Posts: 51
|
Just flip my dssd for a 233, i don't regret. This Panerai is just perfect.
Go for it Cheers Laurent |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
