ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

thsiao · 25 November 2014, 04:57 AM

Please check out my hands-on review on the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore Chronograph at Life of a WIS.

An honest review with many unique photos!

Direct link to review.

Psmith · 25 November 2014, 05:07 AM

Very nice review, thanks

Cru Jones · 25 November 2014, 09:29 PM

great pix.

myclue · 26 November 2014, 02:46 PM

love the pic

elevensheep · 24 December 2014, 08:31 PM

thanks for the write up, brilliant piece

Maxtor · 25 December 2014, 04:20 AM

Great review. I agree with you that they lose points on value.

Over $30K is just too much for a SS watch.

... for that kind of money I want one made of Kryptonite.

Urosfan · 26 December 2014, 03:53 AM

Nice review

currambero · 29 December 2014, 12:21 AM

Great review.

malarky_hk · 29 December 2014, 12:26 PM

Good review and great pics. But that particular piece is not my cup of tea.

Hairdude1 · 3 January 2015, 03:31 PM

Well done buddy

thsiao · 6 January 2015, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psmith

Very nice review, thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cru Jones

great pix.

Quote:

Originally Posted by myclue

love the pic

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hairdude1

Well done buddy

Quote:

Originally Posted by elevensheep

thanks for the write up, brilliant piece

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urosfan

Nice review

Quote:

Originally Posted by currambero

Great review.

Quote:

Originally Posted by malarky_hk

Good review and great pics. But that particular piece is not my cup of tea.

Thank you!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxtor

Great review. I agree with you that they lose points on value.

Over $30K is just too much for a SS watch.

... for that kind of money I want one made of Kryptonite.

Definitely agree with you here... way too much for ss!!!

slcbbrown · 8 January 2015, 06:41 AM

Great review. A few things that I find a bit cheesy for a $33,000 watch:

1. Rubber or plastic straps should be a free extra on this watch. Personally, I think rubber screams "dive watch", and this clearly isn't one.
2. They should have included a fine gator strap along with the rubber, in part, because the integrated strap design is a big aggravation to find in a non-oem version.
3. A buckle, rather than a great deployant? Again, less good, IMO.
4. On the case-- no disagreement about the finish or looks (strictly a taste thing), but not sure I see any special performance value for the size. Almost 15mm thick and either 42 or 44mm diameter but the WR of a Daytona or Breguet TypeXX of 20 years ago. 100m of WR is certainly good but not ground breaking. The case got bigger but no better than predecessors from 20 years ago.

Again, nice review, and I look forward to your next.

thsiao · 8 January 2015, 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slcbbrown

Great review. A few things that I find a bit cheesy for a $33,000 watch:

1. Rubber or plastic straps should be a free extra on this watch. Personally, I think rubber screams "dive watch", and this clearly isn't one.
2. They should have included a fine gator strap along with the rubber, in part, because the integrated strap design is a big aggravation to find in a non-oem version.
3. A buckle, rather than a great deployant? Again, less good, IMO.
4. On the case-- no disagreement about the finish or looks (strictly a taste thing), but not sure I see any special performance value for the size. Almost 15mm thick and either 42 or 44mm diameter but the WR of a Daytona or Breguet TypeXX of 20 years ago. 100m of WR is certainly good but not ground breaking. The case got bigger but no better than predecessors from 20 years ago.

Again, nice review, and I look forward to your next.

Thanks for your input! I do agree with you on item #2... as for #3, I actually prefer tang buckles over deployants. Sure deployants are more fancy and look nicer, but they are often uncomfortable... and comfort should be priority in this case. As for #4, the size could've been a bit smaller for sure, but I guess they are jumping on the bigger is better bandwagon.

25 November 2014, 04:57 AM	#1
thsiao "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: SoCal Posts: 1,248	HANDS-ON REVIEW: Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore Chronograph (26400SO) Please check out my hands-on review on the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore Chronograph at Life of a WIS. An honest review with many unique photos! Direct link to review. __________________ Instagram @lifeofawis www.lifeofawis.com

3 January 2015, 03:31 PM	#10
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Well done buddy __________________ Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018

25 November 2014, 05:07 AM	#2
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Very nice review, thanks __________________

25 November 2014, 09:29 PM	#3
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,264	great pix.

26 November 2014, 02:46 PM	#4
myclue "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: Jersey Watch: Submariner Posts: 424	love the pic

24 December 2014, 08:31 PM	#5
elevensheep "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: David Location: Australia Posts: 321	thanks for the write up, brilliant piece

25 December 2014, 04:20 AM	#6
Maxtor 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Max Location: Toronto Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo Posts: 2,469	Great review. I agree with you that they lose points on value. Over $30K is just too much for a SS watch. ... for that kind of money I want one made of Kryptonite.

26 December 2014, 03:53 AM	#7
Urosfan "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: NYC Watch: Me now Posts: 19,372	Nice review

29 December 2014, 12:21 AM	#8
currambero "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Stockholm Posts: 29	Great review.

29 December 2014, 12:26 PM	#9
malarky_hk "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: ... Watch: Rolex Posts: 4,466	Good review and great pics. But that particular piece is not my cup of tea.

8 January 2015, 06:41 AM	#12
slcbbrown "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: steve Location: dallas area Watch: 50's TT t-bird Posts: 3,689	Great review. A few things that I find a bit cheesy for a $33,000 watch: 1. Rubber or plastic straps should be a free extra on this watch. Personally, I think rubber screams "dive watch", and this clearly isn't one. 2. They should have included a fine gator strap along with the rubber, in part, because the integrated strap design is a big aggravation to find in a non-oem version. 3. A buckle, rather than a great deployant? Again, less good, IMO. 4. On the case-- no disagreement about the finish or looks (strictly a taste thing), but not sure I see any special performance value for the size. Almost 15mm thick and either 42 or 44mm diameter but the WR of a Daytona or Breguet TypeXX of 20 years ago. 100m of WR is certainly good but not ground breaking. The case got bigger but no better than predecessors from 20 years ago. Again, nice review, and I look forward to your next.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)