![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Sam
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: the eastern sky
Posts: 175
|
50th anniv. sub
Is Rolex ever going to stop producing the 50th anniv. sub........so the value will increase?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Louie
Location: CDC/FCGC
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 1,364
|
As would be their pattern, when they re-tool and re-design the Sub like they did with the classic GMT, they will end all remnants of what was.... for a ceramic bezel on a 45 mm head and a new mechanism...all for $8,000. list.
I was told by the Rolex salesrep at my AD that the 50th anniversary watch was a one year only item. When I first saw it in the catalogue in 2005, my notion of rarity was shattered. I am born in 1954, and my wife thought old man gets new watch to celebrate 50 years. I put the watch on today to remember 4 years ago.....NOT! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 472
|
I think the LV will be gone after Basel 2009, when Rolex will re-do the Submariner (to their detriment). My guess is that following that, all LV's will gradually disappear from the market and their price will pop $1,000 or even higher immediately. There just aren't a whole lot of LV's around to begin with - it's (in my opinion) a good investment watch!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jake
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Green Submariner
Posts: 751
|
I think the LV sub will perform well in the future because it is a bridge from the old school to the new school.
__________________
Editor & Publisher of Jake's Rolex World Magazine which you can always find at: http://www.RolexMagazine.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Welcome to TRF!
![]() Back in 2003, the LV was ahead of its time having a Maxi Dial, but imho I could very well see it getting an updated bracelet, beefed up case and green ceramic bezel.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,352
|
Welcome to the forums Rolley7!
![]() Nobody will know until the brand officially announces it will discontinue the LV. Looks like they will be continue to be produced for a least another year since no announcement was made at the Baselworld event earlier this month.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 19
|
Hi, not posted here for a while, but collection now got a definate bias towards the Rolex brand. (more of that later)
Adding to the LV Sub discussion I am sure that I read somewhere that the Z serial watches without the Rolex, Rolex, Rolex on the rehaut are indeed a rarity. Can anyone confirm this ? maseman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,352
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: amk
Posts: 792
|
I can confirmed only a few Z series has no rolex rolex rehaut. I have one Z series without RRR.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 177
|
Does anyone feel that the F series may be worth more then any other LV Sub due to being the first year it was released and not having the RRR? What is a fair price for a preowned LV Sub?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,682
|
Quote:
I can't imagine future collectors being any different LOL! This type would seem to represent the first of the series........ F series-oval, ![]() D series-standard, ![]() Of course there's the 3 tick vs. 5 tick arguement, but I'm not quite as sure about that. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 249
|
Z- W/o Rrr
I agree with Mike the F serial's with the oval 0 maybe the hot one to have, I had 2 of them..
![]() engraving. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 417
|
Quote:
I've been told that z serials with no engraving and CC papers are a rarity...but who knows? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Syracuse, NY
Watch: LV C
Posts: 2,204
|
Anyone have any idea approximately how many LV's are out there? I absolutely love mine, sans the defective luminous material in the minute hand.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Someday, but Rolex may not even know when. Nobody knows.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.