ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

FlyingSpacer · 2 March 2015, 10:41 PM

I should get it back this week, so I'll post pics. And I was in Selfridges yesterday. Had an almost equal mix of under and correctly magnified watches. It didn't seem to be split down to good/poor sellers either. Weird!

doc.kool · 3 March 2015, 12:46 AM

Hope someone tells the AD before selling it to a potentially unhappy customer. I would be very unhappy with that BLRO if I spent that amount of coin on it

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zippo

My Hulk compared to a BLRO in my AD window

FlyingSpacer · 3 March 2015, 01:58 AM

Got the watch today. Job well done by the RSC, and had it in time for my birthday (today). Looks much better now. Here's a quick snap:

AK797 · 3 March 2015, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlyingSpacer

Got the watch today. Job well done by the RSC, and had it in time for my birthday (today). Looks much better now. Here's a quick snap:

Looks beautiful!

doc.kool · 3 March 2015, 02:01 AM

Ahhhhhh. Must feel nice

sickened1 · 3 March 2015, 02:01 AM

Yah, looks great. Glad they sorted it out for ya.

overthehill · 3 March 2015, 02:10 AM

before and after pics?

Chadridv · 3 March 2015, 02:20 AM

I'm happy to hear you got this sorted out and also happy to see the positive support you received for the issue. It would have definitely bothered me too, not only does it seem weird to have something be so different than the historical majority, but the cyclops should be 2.5 or IMO there's no point in having it. I already am not crazy about it so if it's gonna be on the watch it should do its job.

Anyhow, congrats and happy birthday!

AkshayArgade · 20 April 2015, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john_nch

I have been enjoying mine. I find the date more readable and the date window appears more symmetric matching the 6&9 o'clock rectangular hour markers such as a no date sub. I could send it in to RSC to get the cyclops replaced under warranty, but why take a chance in having them scratch the case in the process?

Did you buy this from an AD?

AkshayArgade · 20 April 2015, 08:02 PM

Brand new, bought from AD about a week ago. Was shipped from Switzerland. Love the piece, although I have noticed the magnification is low but crisp to read. Please share your thoughts.

skeen · 20 April 2015, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AkshayArgade

Brand new, bought from AD about a week ago. Was shipped from Switzerland. Love the piece, although I have noticed the magnification is low but crisp to read. Please share your thoughts.

From Rolex's website. What do you think?

AkshayArgade · 20 April 2015, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK797

Looks beautiful!

looks beautiful

2 March 2015, 10:41 PM	#61
FlyingSpacer "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: UK Posts: 96	I should get it back this week, so I'll post pics. And I was in Selfridges yesterday. Had an almost equal mix of under and correctly magnified watches. It didn't seem to be split down to good/poor sellers either. Weird!

3 March 2015, 01:58 AM	#63
FlyingSpacer "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: UK Posts: 96	Got the watch today. Job well done by the RSC, and had it in time for my birthday (today). Looks much better now. Here's a quick snap:

3 March 2015, 02:01 AM	#65
doc.kool "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 610	Ahhhhhh. Must feel nice

3 March 2015, 02:01 AM	#66
sickened1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Ed Location: SoCal Watch: ugiveiswatchuget Posts: 9,050	Yah, looks great. Glad they sorted it out for ya.

3 March 2015, 02:10 AM	#67
overthehill Banned Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: www.watchpics.org Watch: SubC date, BLNR Posts: 414	before and after pics?

3 March 2015, 02:20 AM	#68
Chadridv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Chadri Location: LI, NY Watch: 116610LV Posts: 11,357	I'm happy to hear you got this sorted out and also happy to see the positive support you received for the issue. It would have definitely bothered me too, not only does it seem weird to have something be so different than the historical majority, but the cyclops should be 2.5 or IMO there's no point in having it. I already am not crazy about it so if it's gonna be on the watch it should do its job. Anyhow, congrats and happy birthday!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)