The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 June 2015, 05:19 PM   #31
gileto
"TRF" Member
 
gileto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: France
Posts: 117
After the mail to cancel my future purchase, the seller doesn't want to refund me the deposit I sent him by bank transfer last saturday to reserve this 5512... What do you think?
gileto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2015, 05:39 PM   #32
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by gileto View Post
After the mail to cancel my future purchase, the seller doesn't want to refund me the deposit I sent him by bank transfer last saturday to reserve this 5512... What do you think?

I think he's a crook. But what were the terms? Was it clear that deposits were non-refundable? Often, deposits are final, so you may have to suck that up, unfortunately.
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2015, 05:55 PM   #33
gileto
"TRF" Member
 
gileto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: France
Posts: 117
He just told me to send him 10% of price for deposit to reserve it a few days, time for me to get funds and transfer the remaining amount...

there are their conditions of withdraw :

" Right of withdrawal

(Ref. Art. D.Lgs no.185 of 22/05/99, applying the directive 97/7/ce, relating to protection of consumer rights concerning distance contracts). Purchases concluded at www.XXX.com are regulated by legal decree 185 of 22nd May 1999. The buyer can withdraw from the contract by written communication via registered post to XXX, XXX, (Italy), within 10 working days of receiving the merchandise. Communication can also be sent by telegram or fax to: (XXX) on condition that we receive written confirmation by signed registered post, with return receipt, within 48 hours after said communication. The client must arrange, at his/her own expense, the return of the merchandise, utilizing the original packaging, within 10 days of receipt of said merchandise. The merchandise will be examined and if found intact and void of any damage (unused), the buyer will be refunded as requested (bank transfer, postal order, etc) or substituted with other products of the client's choice. In any case the reimbursement will be made in the shortest time possible, no more than 30 working days from the notification of withdrawal, obviously subject to the return of the merchandise. For no reason must the returned merchandise be sent by Pay on Delivery: In this case it would be immediately sent back. In any case we strongly advise the client to contact us at the address info@XXX.com or by phone at XXX to facilitate the procedure."
gileto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2015, 06:00 PM   #34
gileto
"TRF" Member
 
gileto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: France
Posts: 117
other conditions on their website :

"Conditions of buying new products:

All new watches are available upon request if not present in our storage facilities. The delivery will be agreed at the time of ordering with a maximum wait of 30 days. The payment for new watches must be made immediatley and completely. Only in the case of collection from the shop could a deposit of 30% be allowed with the balance payable upon collection and however we reserve the right to accept this method of payment or not. In the case that XXX is not able to deliver the item within the agreed time the entire payment will be returned to the client. Images of the new watches published on our website are purely indicative. In the absence of specific information relating to the order there cannot be complaints if the order is not exactly as requested. It will not be possible to exercise the right of withdrawal from the purchase of new watches as they have been specifically ordered. XXX is a private company and is in no way affiliated to the brands of watches that it sells."
gileto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2015, 02:27 AM   #35
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by gileto View Post
After the mail to cancel my future purchase, the seller doesn't want to refund me the deposit I sent him by bank transfer last saturday to reserve this 5512... What do you think?
Horrible, crooked seller, if he doesn't refund your deposit, especially considering that the watch was advertised as all original, which it's clearly not.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2015, 03:16 AM   #36
gileto
"TRF" Member
 
gileto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: France
Posts: 117
he meant all rolex original parts...
gileto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2015, 05:26 AM   #37
Velox
"TRF" Member
 
Velox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Aruba
Posts: 198
Hi some very informative posts here , can someone explain to me how you can tell the bezel insert is a service replacement?
Velox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2015, 05:40 AM   #38
wallasey runner
Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velox View Post
Hi some very informative posts here , can someone explain to me how you can tell the bezel insert is a service replacement?
It is all to do with the thickness of the fonts and the shape of certain numbers, like the 4 in 40 and the 5 in 50.

Check out the image below of a correct fat font insert in relation to the insert on the OP images. Also the pearl (or dot or pip) on a service relacement will be luminous, whereas an original will be filled with tritium and will be well dead by now.

Hope this helps.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (107.7 KB, 76 views)
wallasey runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2015, 05:46 AM   #39
wallasey runner
Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 145
In addition, click on the attached if you want to understand more.

http://www.vintagehour.com/visual-co...nserts-part-2/
wallasey runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2015, 06:40 AM   #40
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by gileto View Post
he meant all rolex original parts...
Really? Did he have the word "parts" in there? Even so, if I were the buyer I'd still argue that the watch doesn't have all original "parts." It's semantics at that point, but the luminous is a "part" of the watch, and it's not original.

That issue aside, a seller who didn't disclose that the dial was refinished/relumed is a bad seller, of course. Unless he didn't know. And if that's the case, once it's discovered all bets are off and he should refund all money. Good luck!
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2015, 07:08 AM   #41
wallasey runner
Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 145
The dial is the issue here, most 40 to 50 year old vintage watches will have had service replacement bracelets, inserts and even new glass - that is fine and accepted if declared up front by the seller.

The dial is a completely different issue and a deal killer for most buyers - again unless any restoration work or even declaring a later replacement dial has been put in - some buyers may be prepared to pay - I wouldn't personally.

It seems the dial in the watch is not the one the buyer thought he was placing a deposit against. Is it buyer beware or the seller being economical with the truth - not sure, but my gut feeling is that he should get his deposit back.

The OP is man in a hurry, less than 24 hours later he was on to his next one. He needs to slow down and learn how to do his homework properly.
wallasey runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2015, 02:23 PM   #42
Velox
"TRF" Member
 
Velox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Aruba
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallasey runner View Post
It is all to do with the thickness of the fonts and the shape of certain numbers, like the 4 in 40 and the 5 in 50.

Check out the image below of a correct fat font insert in relation to the insert on the OP images. Also the pearl (or dot or pip) on a service relacement will be luminous, whereas an original will be filled with tritium and will be well dead by now.

Hope this helps.
Ahhh I see, thank you!
Velox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.