ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 July 2015, 07:50 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
Your thoughts on this 6239 please ?
Hello,
been looking at this 6239, could you give me your honest opinion based on the pics below ? thx ! |
15 July 2015, 12:40 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
common guy's, nobody ???
|
15 July 2015, 01:35 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
|
Well there's nothing inherently wrong or fake about it, seems to be in OK original condition. Some people might have a gripe about the lume plots not being perfect.
If it's on Ebay or any other ecommerce sites being sold by a not well known good guy/dealer then do reverse image searches of all the pics to check they're not stolen, ask for a new pic of the watch with time set to your choosing sitting on piece of paper with your name, sellers name and date on etc. Also search for the serial number as a whole and also first 3 or 4 or 5 digits along with the terms 6239, Daytona, Rolex. How much? |
15 July 2015, 02:14 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Paris-France
Watch: 1600/15200/116500
Posts: 226
|
I will pass on this one...
Dial is in bad shape (dots and subcounter dials) as is the case (lugs). |
15 July 2015, 04:21 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
Pretty marginal, at best. Dial with significant degradation and damage. Case with losses from polishing, particularly bezel definition. Ugly hands. It isn't very difficult to find a nice, respectable 6239, I wouldn't advise settling on this example.
Michael |
15 July 2015, 04:21 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
By the way, the dial and bezel do seem consistent with respect to age and production date.
Michael |
15 July 2015, 05:42 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
|
It all depends on how much?
How perfect and unworn/new looking do you want your 50 year old watch to look, or more to the point how perfect and unworn can you afford it to look? I think this one is OK, not perfect but obviously been a daily wearer for decades and polished some times. Lugs are consistent with many 62xx watches from the 60's and 70's, not at all terrible imo and the same as you often see for sale from the much heralded "trusted sellers" on here for high prices. I doubt you will ever see an unpolished 6239 for sale. If it's running well (or the seller will discount appropriately for due service), you're sure the seller is legit, it's a good price and YOU like it then go for it |
15 July 2015, 06:27 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
Sellers is legit no worries there
I've seen it live and it looks nice ( not perfect of course....) In the mean time i've searched the web and found it as sold on HQ Miltons site some time ago. (100% the same watch) I'm in europe so prices are higher than the us Asking price is around 25k € |
15 July 2015, 06:50 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,132
|
Listen to Michael buddy. Mediocre example.
|
15 July 2015, 07:13 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
|
|
15 July 2015, 07:22 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
Thx for the input guy's you slowed me down :-)
|
16 July 2015, 01:01 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Case has been considerably 'eroded'...
__________________
|
16 July 2015, 01:34 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
As others have mentioned, this 6239 is in mediocre/average condition at best. There are far too many 6239's available to justify purchasing an example in this condition.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.