ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ck1109 · 17 July 2015, 06:28 PM

I have a flat 6" wrist and the 15400 was too big. Even the 15202 was big.

154500:

15202:

Igor01 · 20 July 2015, 03:22 AM

My wrist is 5.75" and a 15400 looks perfectly fine on it. Silver dial too which is supposed to appear bigger than black or blue ones.

yjfang · 20 July 2015, 04:14 AM

Here's the 39MM 15202 on a 7.5" wrist. IMHO, the RO should not wear large as it is a dressier watch.

jjnd08 · 20 July 2015, 09:37 AM

How'd the smaller sizes work, OP?

I think the 15450 would definitely be better.

20 July 2015, 03:22 AM	#32
Igor01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Canada Watch: AP Royal Oak 15400 Posts: 82	My wrist is 5.75" and a 15400 looks perfectly fine on it. Silver dial too which is supposed to appear bigger than black or blue ones. __________________ VC Overseas Chronograph \| AP Royal Oak 15400 \| Rolex 116610LN \| Vostok Komandirskie K65 \| Casio G-Shock GW-5000

20 July 2015, 09:37 AM	#34
jjnd08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 8,615	How'd the smaller sizes work, OP? I think the 15450 would definitely be better. __________________ ---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches

17 July 2015, 06:28 PM	#31
ck1109 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: WA Watch: Many... Posts: 427	I have a flat 6" wrist and the 15400 was too big. Even the 15202 was big. 154500: 15202:

20 July 2015, 04:14 AM	#33
yjfang "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: JF Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 Posts: 1,426	Here's the 39MM 15202 on a 7.5" wrist. IMHO, the RO should not wear large as it is a dressier watch.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)