The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 July 2015, 08:45 PM   #31
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
This should be in the non-rolex section. That said, we have some members who have and love thier hublots.

It's a dead horse but yeah the derivative styling, oversized cases, foolish names like King bang boom, initial use of eta movements in expensive watches and such have become reason for many to dislike the brand.
I agree totally with this but they have made progress in their in house movements and do propose some grand complications, so do I like them? No, but I respect the brand for some of it's achievements, aside from the Big Bang and Spirit of Big Bang they do have some interesting models, but just not for me, but I'm not really in the market for over sized watches, if I was I think I would still rather go with Panerai and AP than Hublot
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 10:32 PM   #32
dr.ns23
"TRF" Member
 
dr.ns23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Somewhere
Watch: 15202
Posts: 436
I respect everyone's opinion here but I think that some are being harsh and unfair towards Hublot. Specifically people that do not own a Hublot watch. I own 2 Hublots together with several Rolex, Panerai and soon will be purchasing my first AP (either 15202 or 15400 blue face). Between the watches I currently own my favourite ones are the Hublot. The watches are working well and as accurate as any other brand I own. Let alone, the great customer service they have. Whenever you purchase a new watch, you can contact JCB (previous CEO and current chairman at Hublot) to receive a 5 year extended warranty directly from him. Furthermore, you can contact JCB directly about any issue or question you have and he always replies... So in short, I personally believe that Hublot is a very good brand with a lot of potential for the future and judging it without even experiencing the watch on your wrist is a bit unfair.
dr.ns23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 11:08 PM   #33
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeopardy View Post
So in short, I personally believe that Hublot is a very good brand with a lot of potential for the future and judging it without even experiencing the watch on your wrist is a bit unfair.
So you're saying I have to BUY a Hublot in order to not like it? I have tried them on and just don't like them-period. No ownership required. Do I have to trade my Lamborghini for a Hyundai to know I don't want a Hyundai...no.

I do agree one should try them on (I did).

It will appeal to some and to others not so much (like any brand).

To each their own
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 11:57 PM   #34
GB-man
2025 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapince View Post
I agree totally with this but they have made progress in their in house movements and do propose some grand complications, so do I like them? No, but I respect the brand for some of it's achievements, aside from the Big Bang and Spirit of Big Bang they do have some interesting models, but just not for me, but I'm not really in the market for over sized watches, if I was I think I would still rather go with Panerai and AP than Hublot
Of course Arnaud that's why I said "initial" use of eta.
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 12:11 AM   #35
Koi6715
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Uk
Posts: 192
as AP produce sports watches is it not logic to see Golfers advertising As AP ambassadors
Nick Faldo has been for years
This was how I had first contact with AP watching then ambassador Rory McElroy so the advertising works, because I was going to buy a HUblot
Then got onto AP because I love the game of GOlf and once I knew of the brand research and reading about its heritage and history etc I brought my watch

Id rather see all golfers tennis players wear AP than footballers/ rappers celebrities

Sports watches for sportsmen and women 😀
Koi6715 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 12:15 AM   #36
Presa canary
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,155
Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
So you're saying I have to BUY a Hublot in order to not like it? I have tried them on and just don't like them-period. No ownership required. Do I have to trade my Lamborghini for a Hyundai to know I don't want a Hyundai...no.

I do agree one should try them on (I did). It will appeal to some and to others not so much (like any brand). To each their own--just like opinions
Wow....
Presa canary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 12:25 AM   #37
RollyFan98012
"TRF" Member
 
RollyFan98012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: US
Watch: DSSD,PAM
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
It's just watches.... I don't understand the "hate". Different strokes for different folks.

X2


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RollyFan98012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 12:39 AM   #38
dr.ns23
"TRF" Member
 
dr.ns23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Somewhere
Watch: 15202
Posts: 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
So you're saying I have to BUY a Hublot in order to not like it? I have tried them on and just don't like them-period. No ownership required. Do I have to trade my Lamborghini for a Hyundai to know I don't want a Hyundai...no.

I do agree one should try them on (I did).

It will appeal to some and to others not so much (like any brand).

To each their own
Take it easy, why this attitude!!! I didn't force you to buy a watch, I just said people should go give it a try before judging. And that's what you exactly did. If we all had the same taste there would have been only one brand in this world...

I simply was giving my own personal opinion based on my experience with the brand.

Relax and enjoy your Lamborghini.
dr.ns23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 12:42 AM   #39
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeopardy View Post
Take it easy, why this attitude!!! I didn't force you to buy a watch, I just said people should go give it a try before judging. And that's what you exactly did. If we all had the same taste there would have been only one brand in this world...

I simply was giving my own personal opinion based on my experience with the brand.

Relax and enjoy your Lamborghini.
Easy, no attitude. Just responding to your post.

I think we both agree--try on before making a decision if possible (with any brand).

It's that simple.

Enjoy and I will enjoy the Lambo
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 01:32 AM   #40
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeopardy View Post
I respect everyone's opinion here but I think that some are being harsh and unfair towards Hublot. Specifically people that do not own a Hublot watch. I own 2 Hublots together with several Rolex, Panerai and soon will be purchasing my first AP (either 15202 or 15400 blue face). So in short, I personally believe that Hublot is a very good brand with a lot of potential for the future and judging it without even experiencing the watch on your wrist is a bit unfair.
You can't expect on a AP forum a lot of love for Hublot as the design is clearly at 80% a copy of AP, just my opinion of course but it seems to me that most here will agree, that's why as I said earlier I have no respect for their big bang and spirit of BB, clearly a copy of AP/PP, to such a point that I wonder if AP didn't sue them, but I do for another of their lines which have grand complication movements and it seems for some that they are made in house.
The most important is that you like your watches, Hublot or others, and no one should care what others think about the watches one likes, the 2 I have are usually loved by the vast majority of members here but it wasn't the case when I had my Blancpain L-Evolution alarm GMT, most members said they found it ugly before I bought it and was asking for opinions, well I didn't care and didn't try to make everyone change their mind, tastes are subjective and to each their own

Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Of course Arnaud that's why I said "initial" use of eta.
Yeah Tom

Quote:
Originally Posted by Koi6715 View Post
as AP produce sports watches is it not logic to see Golfers advertising As AP ambassadors
Nick Faldo has been for years
This was how I had first contact with AP watching then ambassador Rory McElroy so the advertising works, because I was going to buy a HUblot
Then got onto AP because I love the game of GOlf and once I knew of the brand research and reading about its heritage and history etc I brought my watch

Id rather see all golfers tennis players wear AP than footballers/ rappers celebrities

Sports watches for sportsmen and women 😀
I agree I hate watches endorsed by Stallone and other actors or rappers, I prefer watches endorsed by no one, but if they are I prefer sportsmen than celebrities

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeopardy View Post
Take it easy, why this attitude!!! I didn't force you to buy a watch, I just said people should go give it a try before judging. And that's what you exactly did. If we all had the same taste there would have been only one brand in this world...

I simply was giving my own personal opinion based on my experience with the brand.

Relax and enjoy your Lamborghini.
Well I saw them many times in real, and I really don't like the BB, SPIRIT OF BB, but some other models are interesting, mainly their skeleton models with complications.

Don't worry I'm sure he enjoys his Lambo
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 03:22 AM   #41
TheMethod
"TRF" Member
 
TheMethod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Rolex, AP, GS, JLC
Posts: 790
Before I owned a Rolex, I had an affinity for Rolex just by looking at them... same for AP. However, I don't have the same feeling when I look at Hublot or some other brands. To each their own.
TheMethod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 05:28 AM   #42
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,707
I think threads about Hublot should be taken to the Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum. Every few weeks an AP vs Hublot thread pops up and it has been covered ad infinitum. If you want to discuss Hublot, great, take it off the AP forum because it does not belong here.
SMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 05:31 AM   #43
yjfang
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: JF
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680
Posts: 1,426
Additionally they should make this thread a sticky so that we don't have to rehash this all over again in 3 weeks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMD View Post
I think threads about Hublot should be taken to the Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum. Every few weeks an AP vs Hublot thread pops up and it has been covered ad infinitum. If you want to discuss Hublot, great, take it off the AP forum because it does not belong here.
yjfang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 05:35 AM   #44
improviz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by yjfang View Post
Additionally they should make this thread a sticky so that we don't have to rehash this all over again in 3 weeks.
Yeah, all of them by newbs too, shit most people I know who are into Hublots have no idea what an AP even *is*.
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black.
improviz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 05:36 AM   #45
Presa canary
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,155
I get douche chills reading this thread....
Presa canary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 07:38 AM   #46
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMD View Post
I think threads about Hublot should be taken to the Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum. Every few weeks an AP vs Hublot thread pops up and it has been covered ad infinitum. If you want to discuss Hublot, great, take it off the AP forum because it does not belong here.
Yep, got one not even 10 days ago it seems….

Quote:
Originally Posted by yjfang View Post
Additionally they should make this thread a sticky so that we don't have to rehash this all over again in 3 weeks.
In 3 weeks if we're lucky, I think before that

Quote:
Originally Posted by improviz View Post
Yeah, all of them by newbs too, shit most people I know who are into Hublots have no idea what an AP even *is*.
Well most people don't recognize a Patek either, in 1 year ownership the only time I got a remark about my Patek was "is that a Royal Oak?"
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 08:10 AM   #47
daytonaTBR
"TRF" Member
 
daytonaTBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,466
Well most people don't recognize a Patek either, in 1 year ownership the only time I got a remark about my Patek was "is that a Royal Oak?" [/QUOTE]

daytonaTBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 09:33 AM   #48
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aw15 View Post
Well most people don't recognize a Patek either, in 1 year ownership the only time I got a remark about my Patek was "is that a Royal Oak?"
[/QUOTE]

Well it did make me laugh at least

Tomorrow I'm going for 6 weeks in Odessa Ukraine, I'm taking the Patek and AP, rarely saw any AP's there but tons of Hublot's, real and fake, there's a high probability someone will ask me if my diver is a Hublot
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 03:28 PM   #49
h999r
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: HR
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: -ing Barts.
Posts: 4,244
I don't mind buying this brand as long as it's not buying new. Some of the design are nice and innovative , like the magic gold.
But to spend that much money id rather spend about more and get the AP.
h999r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 09:33 PM   #50
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Well I don't mind the design of some Hublots and for instance like their Carbon fibre dials, and unlike many I never really thought the BBs looked that much like the ROOs as the ROO octagon is so distinctive. My main issue was with the very high prices they charged for basic ETAs and then they had all these celebrities and footballers buying them and it all seemed like a bit of a con trick, an Emperor's New Clothes trick. Recently they have added more substance to the brand and Biver's service is creditable, but the tarnish remains for me.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 10:08 PM   #51
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
They are just watches. To each their own....No big deal.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2015, 01:57 PM   #52
Ticking_Sonata
"TRF" Member
 
Ticking_Sonata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: mon
Location: earth
Posts: 670
I do respect a lot of people here dont like hublot at all or even hate it. However IMO, hublot is very nice esp the classic fusion and unico line. Unico is more comparable to ROO rather than classic fusion. I owned big bang unico for several months, what i can tell is the movenent is very nice 72 PR with semi skeleton and more importantly the precision is spot on. I have several ROO's and almost most them have the same problem which are the watches are running too fast. So we can see here that AP have a big problem for their movement.
Jump into conclusion, i do respect a lot for hublot as their progress this couple of years are great, but my heart will be still with AP no matter what.
Ticking_Sonata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2015, 02:05 PM   #53
gummy
2025 Pledge Member
 
gummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,353
I just don't get warm and fuzzy with the brand...feel my money is better spent elsewhere...
gummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2015, 02:07 PM   #54
robisan
"TRF" Member
 
robisan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PH
Posts: 545
Preowned mint that's a good deal I might get one. Never brand new, 15k for an ETA movement with just a ceramic/ss case, I just can't.
robisan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2015, 10:23 PM   #55
JJ WA
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Seattle
Posts: 787
I think some opinions here tend to be a bit too harsh on Hublot. I own a Big Bang, which I love, but I consider it as just a 'fun' watch, in a positive way. Is it nearly as great as AP, PP, ALS? Of course 'not'. Still, my Hublot peacefully coexists in the collection with APs, PP, Rolexes etc. Life isn't to be taken too seriously either. ��
JJ WA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.