|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 May 2008, 12:04 PM
|
#31 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 59
|
I would say the SD -- it is:
1. understated 2. technologically more advanced 3. discontinued Better all-purpose watch whether wearing a suit or shorts. And if the price is similar, then I would assume the TT sub is in worse shape? |
|
|
|
29 May 2008, 02:00 PM
|
#32 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Gil
Location: NC
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 432
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 May 2008, 02:50 PM
|
#33 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 386
|
sd
|
|
|
|
|
29 May 2008, 02:51 PM
|
#34 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Palm Beach, Fl
Watch: Sea dweller.
Posts: 311
|
TT sub
__________________
white gold plz |
|
|
|
|
29 May 2008, 03:08 PM
|
#35 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 676
|
TT Blue Sub for sure. I just went through the same choice and the Blue Sub went home with me. I'd still like a SD though......maybe next time.
|
|
|
|
|
29 May 2008, 03:37 PM
|
#36 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Michael
Location: LaLa Land
Watch: Sub Date 16610
Posts: 1,757
|
I say SD.... awsome watch... the history and 'tool' aspect appeal to me too. :-)
|
|
|
|
|
29 May 2008, 03:38 PM
|
#37 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Michael
Location: LaLa Land
Watch: Sub Date 16610
Posts: 1,757
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 May 2008, 03:46 PM
|
#38 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,192
|
Sea Dweller. (I'm a total "tool" head.)
David, you are a rotten equivocator . . . but I still like you because you drink a lot of wine and look like you are having fun. |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
