The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 August 2015, 02:05 PM   #1
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
Sea-Dwellers Good Value

It seems like there's always an abundance of Sea-Dwellers for sale at excellent prices - relative to their MSRP. Any thoughts as to why there are always so many for sale? I'd love a Submariner one day, but a Sea-Dweller would be just as good in my mind.
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 03:45 PM   #2
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
It seems like there is a greater abundance of Subs available.

I love my Sea Dweller. I feels just like my Milgauss on my wrist, whereas the Subs feel a bit lighter. No Cyclops to goober up the crystal. Size and readability are as good as my other watches too.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 03:55 PM   #3
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,320
Discounts are greater because non wis want the sub. Wis are a small niche of the Rolex community. Much smaller than the crunchy peanut butter crew
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 06:02 AM   #4
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
Good input....thank you. As far as dimensions go are the Sub and the SD the same?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 06:09 AM   #5
wantonebad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
wantonebad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Discounts are greater because non wis want the sub. Wis are a small niche of the Rolex community. Much smaller than the crunchy peanut butter crew
So wait, what if I prefer smooth peanutbutter... what does that make me?
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal...
on a fairly irrelevant social media site
that falsely inflates my fragile ego"
wantonebad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 06:09 AM   #6
SD23
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 12
SubCs are a lot easier to move because they wear bigger (even though they're both 40 mm) because of the lugs, flat crystal and the current trend of larger watches is still going strong.
SD23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 06:24 AM   #7
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by chloebear View Post
Good input....thank you. As far as dimensions go are the Sub and the SD the same?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pretty much...they're both 40mm. The case, however, is thicker on the SD, and I believe it is a little heavier.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 07:02 AM   #8
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by SD23 View Post
SubCs are a lot easier to move because they wear bigger (even though they're both 40 mm) because of the lugs, flat crystal and the current trend of larger watches is still going strong.

Interesting. I assumed the SD would wear larger. I need to go look at them head-to-head. Does anyone have photos of both together?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 07:11 AM   #9
Joe.King
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Joe
Location: Florida
Watch: AP
Posts: 199
SD


SubC
Joe.King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 07:28 AM   #10
crfsocal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 690
The Lugs on the SD a more narrow, makes it look smaller but they are the sam size 40mm (SD is thicker).

The reason I believe you see a lot of Subs and SD for sale is that for the non enthusiasts those are the first watches they buy... Don't forget buyers remorse also...
crfsocal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 11:36 AM   #11
El Cascarrabias
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: USA
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by chloebear View Post
. . . I assumed the SD would wear larger. I need to go look at them head-to-head.
Yes, you do. Thought I wanted the Subc until I tried the SDc. Didn't like the Sub's lugs. Too big.

Bought the SDc. Slightly taller and heavier but not objectionably so. With lugs that are more traditional it looks more proportional compared to the Sub.
El Cascarrabias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 11:50 AM   #12
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
Interesting differences. I like a slightly taller and heavier watch.....That's part of the reason I have a Milgauss instead of a DJ. Ironically the Milgauss and the SD are the only two sports models with text on the underside.
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 12:00 PM   #13
fishingbear
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
fishingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,539
They wear differently for sure, and the SD is heavier with thicker case and crystal. The SubC seems to distribute its weight broadly on the wrist where the SD 4000 sits up higher so the higher center of gravity balances differently. They both are super comfortable; Glidelock certainly helps with that.
Now if you're referring to the 5 digit references: Ditto sans the Glidelock.
fishingbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 12:01 PM   #14
Trailblazer
"TRF" Member
 
Trailblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Cab
Location: A small world
Watch: es
Posts: 776
I like my peanut butter and also my 2 SDs, what am I?

Love diving watches, but sadly never own any date subs b4, had a fling with a 14060M 2liner but traded due to some problem, missing that but at least my 2 SDs are keeping me warm.

The only part I do not understand is the date on the SD, its an amazing watch with a fantastic case, but that date…oh well I can live with that.
Trailblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 12:25 PM   #15
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
I never noticed how much the crystal protrudes above the bezel on the SD. That's really cool. I'm going to have to get to an AD and take a closer look at these. I love the Sub as well as the DSSD, but I think the SD is a little more unique. The DSSD is out of my price range.
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 12:49 PM   #16
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
Does anyone know the weight differential and thickness differential between the Submariner and the SD?
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2015, 12:39 AM   #17
SD23
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 12
Another difference between the SD and the Sub is the solid end links on the SD sit above the lugs.
SD23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.