![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Al
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,153
|
You bought the right watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Close to Rolex AD
Posts: 3,474
|
I like EXPLORER II but DJ II is classier watch however for extreme sports I would pick the first one
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 557
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,298
|
I have both, and agree with comments.
Oysterlock on the Explorer vs. Oysterclasp on the DJII is where I notice a difference, but neither is going to fall off your wrist. One for dress/work, one for play. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
IMO an oyster case is an oyster case, therefore except for depth rating on the dive models one is just as tough as the other.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: los angleles
Watch: Submariner Hulk
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
i would greatly appreciate you changing your avatar. My wife sometimes gets on this site. She sees your avatar of the muscle ripped guy, and has to go to bed and sleep all night with me. Your not making things very easy for me. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,284
|
Quote:
AND congrats!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,646
|
This is a personal choice thing..
They both use the same movement except the DJII has a date. Performance and "robustness" would be essentially the same.. Personally, I would have gone the other way. That's why Rolex makes the two - choice. ![]()
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, NY
Posts: 1,089
|
Also...
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: .
Location: .
Watch: 228238, 4500v, 126
Posts: 771
|
Great choice! I would've gone with the dj as well
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.