ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 February 2016, 08:37 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 19
|
Best place to purchase a used 93150 clasp?
Hello,
Please pardon the stupid question, but what would be the best/safest route to purchase a 93150 locking clasp for my 16700? I feel uncertain about purchasing from Ebay. Thank you for any assistance! |
3 February 2016, 08:59 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Best place to purchase a used 93150 clasp?
If yours is broken....why not get a RSC - or an AD with a parts account / watch maker to replace it with a new one?
The best / safest route I know. |
3 February 2016, 09:01 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 19
|
Thanks for the reply. I have the 78360 non-locking clasp, still functional, and really want the locking feature of the 31950.
|
3 February 2016, 09:42 AM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
|
The best route is to find a complete bracelet.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
3 February 2016, 09:44 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 19
|
Thank you, Tools! I see what you mean
Random question, would the 91350 clasp be a bolt-on upgrade to my existing bracelet though? Or do you think I'd have fitment issues? |
3 February 2016, 09:47 AM | #6 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
|
Any Oyster clasp will fit on any Oyster bracelet, you just need all the parts..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
3 February 2016, 09:48 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 19
|
|
3 February 2016, 12:38 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,858
|
There are several for sale in the classified section right here on TRF. It is a direct replacement except for the one tiny issue that the link that is permanently attached to the new clasp will have a brushed finish on the sides of it whereas all your other links will have polished sides. The 93150 clasp is alot longer that the 78360 so your bracelet will gain some length in the process. You can also search for a 78790 clasp which has the fliplock too and is shorter and has an attachment link with polished sides.
|
3 February 2016, 01:11 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 19
|
NKflyer- Very good info here, thank you!
I wasn't fully aware of the length difference. Hmm, that makes me very interested in the 78790 clasp! |
3 February 2016, 01:19 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
Thank you! |
|
3 February 2016, 02:11 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 19
|
Please disregard my last. Upon further inspection, I would of course need more parts than is listed.
|
3 February 2016, 02:27 PM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,858
|
Whichever fliplock clasp you choose, I would try to buy a whole clasp with blades, attachment link, etc which is a one minute swap and you can retain your existing clasp for originality. Something like this (I have no affiliation with this seller, just an example):
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=442508 The 93150 clasp is longer to allow for the divers extension that is normally fitted but you can remove a link from the 12 o'clock side of the bracelet to compensate. It sounds like the 78790 clasp might be more suitable but they are going to be more scarce to find. The 93150 was in production for almost 20 years already before the 78790 was introduced. |
3 February 2016, 02:37 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 19
|
Perfect! Thank you so much for the help on this. I've been searching unsuccessfully for a complete 78790 (w/ blades & attachment link etc). Now I understand why it's so much harder to find.
I see what you mean about removing a link from the 12 o'clock side. Thank you for posting the classified link...contacting him now. Thank you, Sir |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.