ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Gaijin · 16 February 2016, 02:15 PM

I have nothing to add except...

IBTL!

joli160 · 16 February 2016, 03:46 PM

Gordon, probably the reason behind this not discussing in detail is to not make the crooks any wiser. There are real experts who give sound advice in this section. Just have a little faith in their expertise and be grateful of the advice they provide and help in this way many of us to avoid buying junk. I for one really appreciate that.

Mosbrook · 16 February 2016, 10:17 PM

The rules do seem to conflict with one another.

123Blueface · 16 February 2016, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonC

Wow, great contribution from 123Blueface as well. I actually paid to be a member of this site and share the enthusiasm for Rolex with Rolex owners, paid to support this site (unlike 123Blueface), to be told to go somewhere else to find out information that is supposed to be topical HERE??!! Nice job.

Knock yourself out all you want with your rant on your opinion of what this forum should be like but I am following the rules.

Regarding a pledge member, I do with my money what I wish and when I wish. If I feel I want to contribute, I will but it won't be because of a bullish post on your part calling me out for not doing so.

Note that half of the posts on this thread are from non pledge members.
If you feel special, enjoy.

When I said Google it, if you would take two minutes to do, you will find a litany of photos to compare this piece of crap watch to and even a legally blind person, Pledge Member, would see the blatant differences.

Good luck with your venture.

breitlings · 17 February 2016, 01:04 AM

Gordon, first that op's watch isn't even close. To ask for what is wrong would be a very long post. If you want to learn more about this, just follow the section, you pick up info incrementally. Or PM someone. I think it is very obvious that fake rolex devalue, and defraud Rolex and Rolex owners. This isn't like using someone's picture on your website, this is hard intellectual property theft and I don't want to help the counterfitters who focus on this industry as well as others, while generally making life worse for everyone because of their fakes.

16 February 2016, 03:46 PM	#32
joli160 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,744	Gordon, probably the reason behind this not discussing in detail is to not make the crooks any wiser. There are real experts who give sound advice in this section. Just have a little faith in their expertise and be grateful of the advice they provide and help in this way many of us to avoid buying junk. I for one really appreciate that. __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

16 February 2016, 02:15 PM	#31
Gaijin 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Japan Watch: ing your back. Posts: 16,179	I have nothing to add except... IBTL!

16 February 2016, 10:17 PM	#33
Mosbrook "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Cleveland Posts: 414	The rules do seem to conflict with one another.

17 February 2016, 01:04 AM	#35
breitlings Banned Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Bethesda Watch: Apple TV Posts: 5,744	Gordon, first that op's watch isn't even close. To ask for what is wrong would be a very long post. If you want to learn more about this, just follow the section, you pick up info incrementally. Or PM someone. I think it is very obvious that fake rolex devalue, and defraud Rolex and Rolex owners. This isn't like using someone's picture on your website, this is hard intellectual property theft and I don't want to help the counterfitters who focus on this industry as well as others, while generally making life worse for everyone because of their fakes.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)