ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

GolfTango3 · 22 February 2016, 09:15 AM

I wear my 116710LN way more than my 116520. I would not do this deal.

And you are welcome to Diet Coke and fancy coffee drinks at my house anytime so don't be lured in by those shenanigans. They might also throw free cookies your way. Also, not worth it.

Greenwich Mean Time · 22 February 2016, 09:18 AM

I wouldn't do that trade. Instead I'd look for a Tudor Chrono (pre-tiger woods) or an Omega PO chrono. You should be able to get either one for $3K or less.

Kneecough · 22 February 2016, 09:20 AM

Personally, I would not.

busytimmy · 22 February 2016, 09:35 AM

No way

Al1969 · 22 February 2016, 10:25 AM

I wouldn't do it unless you're going for a "Grail" piece. Otherwise, I'd keep the GMT and trade the sub towards the Daytona.

brandrea · 22 February 2016, 10:29 AM

Nope

darwin95 · 22 February 2016, 12:27 PM

My answer is NO.
However, i would do it if it was Gmtc plus cash for Daytona leaving your sub alone.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GsurgBM · 22 February 2016, 12:59 PM

I would

srvrf · 22 February 2016, 01:15 PM

I only own chronographs and have had both a black-dialed 116520 and white-dialed 16520 and would say unless you're convinced it is your grail, I would not do it. Fit for me was excellent and the finish was typical Rolex. But I thought legibility was too poor due to the multiple reflective surfaces (crystal, hands, and dial). In the end, I really wanted a date feature for work purposes, and I wasn't a huge fan of the PCLs (but it wasn't a deal-breaker in either case).

AF_Rob · 22 February 2016, 01:20 PM

No way.

Brian Page · 22 February 2016, 01:22 PM

No - for me, I love the Daytona and own one but wouldn't let those two go for it. Save and get a Daytona.

GradyPhilpott · 22 February 2016, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tommywerdz

I wouldn't do it.

x2

CRM114 · 22 February 2016, 02:26 PM

Keep the GMT, trade Sub, and add cash for the Daytona.

Hairdude1 · 22 February 2016, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karmatp

NO WAY

I am not a Daytona fan at all. Your GMT and Sub are great watches, don't let them go. Go buy a Speedy Pro if you want a chrono.

This

jphj012 · 22 February 2016, 02:47 PM

NO. I know the Daytona has a history and everything, but not worth trading two watches for one.

AK1984 · 22 February 2016, 02:54 PM

Thanks all. Some great insights, as always

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

brian89 · 22 February 2016, 03:12 PM

id keep the sub and add cash to gmt

luvsub · 22 February 2016, 03:19 PM

If Daytona is what YOU like, then do it. It is a beautiful watch.

pinkelle21 · 22 February 2016, 04:11 PM

No!😎

Sent using Pied piper compression app

HogwldFLTR · 22 February 2016, 04:57 PM

It depends on how much you want the new one and how much you'd miss the old ones. Only you can answer that question.

WristEnvy · 22 February 2016, 09:13 PM

GMT and sub being your only two I wouldn't do it. If you had an excess of GMT and divers, then I'd say heck yeah do it.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

22 February 2016, 10:25 AM	#35
Al1969 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 6,638	I wouldn't do it unless you're going for a "Grail" piece. Otherwise, I'd keep the GMT and trade the sub towards the Daytona. __________________ WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719

22 February 2016, 12:27 PM	#37
darwin95 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Northeast Watch: Yourself Posts: 1,020	Would you....? My answer is NO. However, i would do it if it was Gmtc plus cash for Daytona leaving your sub alone. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

22 February 2016, 12:59 PM	#38
GsurgBM "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: USA Watch: Not enough Posts: 3,759	I would __________________ Rolex • Tudor • Omega • Panerai

22 February 2016, 04:57 PM	#50
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,663	It depends on how much you want the new one and how much you'd miss the old ones. Only you can answer that question. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

22 February 2016, 09:15 AM	#31
GolfTango3 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Louisville Posts: 26	I wear my 116710LN way more than my 116520. I would not do this deal. And you are welcome to Diet Coke and fancy coffee drinks at my house anytime so don't be lured in by those shenanigans. They might also throw free cookies your way. Also, not worth it.

22 February 2016, 09:18 AM	#32
Greenwich Mean Time "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: PNW Watch: 116710LN Posts: 467	I wouldn't do that trade. Instead I'd look for a Tudor Chrono (pre-tiger woods) or an Omega PO chrono. You should be able to get either one for $3K or less.

22 February 2016, 09:20 AM	#33
Kneecough "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Florida Posts: 1,792	Personally, I would not.

22 February 2016, 09:35 AM	#34
busytimmy "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Sydney, Australia Watch: ing the detectives Posts: 3,745	No way

22 February 2016, 10:29 AM	#36
brandrea 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 77,755	Nope

22 February 2016, 01:15 PM	#39
srvrf 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Steve Location: Indiana Watch: PP/AP/VC Posts: 2,152	I only own chronographs and have had both a black-dialed 116520 and white-dialed 16520 and would say unless you're convinced it is your grail, I would not do it. Fit for me was excellent and the finish was typical Rolex. But I thought legibility was too poor due to the multiple reflective surfaces (crystal, hands, and dial). In the end, I really wanted a date feature for work purposes, and I wasn't a huge fan of the PCLs (but it wasn't a deal-breaker in either case).

22 February 2016, 01:20 PM	#40
AF_Rob "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Rob Location: Virginia Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB Posts: 4,667	No way.

22 February 2016, 01:22 PM	#41
Brian Page "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: USA Posts: 6,623	No - for me, I love the Daytona and own one but wouldn't let those two go for it. Save and get a Daytona.

22 February 2016, 02:26 PM	#43
CRM114 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: HK & USA Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV Posts: 2,001	Keep the GMT, trade Sub, and add cash for the Daytona.

22 February 2016, 02:47 PM	#45
jphj012 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: James Location: New Jersey Watch: Milgauss GV Posts: 240	NO. I know the Daytona has a history and everything, but not worth trading two watches for one.

22 February 2016, 02:54 PM	#46
AK1984 Banned Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Hickory Posts: 243	Thanks all. Some great insights, as always Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

22 February 2016, 03:12 PM	#47
brian89 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: qc Posts: 240	id keep the sub and add cash to gmt

22 February 2016, 03:19 PM	#48
luvsub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SF, south bay Posts: 5,221	If Daytona is what YOU like, then do it. It is a beautiful watch.

22 February 2016, 04:11 PM	#49
pinkelle21 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: california coast Watch: rolex 116300 Posts: 741	No!😎 Sent using Pied piper compression app

22 February 2016, 09:13 PM	#51
WristEnvy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: Ray Location: Berkeley, CA Watch: IG @watch.kakashi Posts: 2,579	GMT and sub being your only two I wouldn't do it. If you had an excess of GMT and divers, then I'd say heck yeah do it. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)