|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 February 2016, 10:20 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 548
|
GMT 1675 Small Hand
Which year was the last for a small hand?
|
|
|
|
25 February 2016, 02:14 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: SeB
Location: Germany
Watch: MaD_aT_gMt
Posts: 1,219
|
IMHO something around the 1.68 Mio.
Mine was a 1.68 Mio. serial and I know 2 others from fellow collectors that are in the 1.67 Mio range. All in combination with the tritium-zinksulfit-mixture. |
|
|
|
|
25 February 2016, 02:19 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,483
|
My 1,655,6xx
 Still glowing! 50 years later; at least for five seconds after bright light exposure. |
|
|
|
|
25 February 2016, 09:18 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 548
|
Re:
Many thanks for all your input, gentleman!
|
|
|
|
|
25 February 2016, 10:12 AM
|
#6 |
|
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,473
|
Some good replies here. Based on my experience, the 1.6 million range is fairly common for a vintage white-lettered GMT dial to have the small 24-hour hand. This would place the case backs in the II 67 and earlier era.
Enjoy your GMTs gentlemen...I know I am!!!
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
|
|
|
25 February 2016, 10:33 AM
|
#7 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,483
|
Quote:
 Yes, my case back is II.67 too on my 1,655,6XX 1675. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
