|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 February 2016, 02:01 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: VT
Location: Montreal
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 11
|
Tudor Tiger VS Non-Tiger 79280
Hello guys!
I'm debating if I should get the Tudor Tiger Chrono or the NON-Tiger 79280 version... What do you guys think? Is the Tiger more of a collector piece since it was just produced from 1999-2002 VS until 2007 for the NON-Tiger. I bought a Omega Speedmaster edition Schumacher Yellow Dial years ago, thinking it will go higher in value, but that wasn't the case at all...what about the Tudor Tiger ? Thanks for your help! |
|
|
|
28 February 2016, 02:06 PM
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Get the Tudor none tiger
|
|
|
|
|
28 February 2016, 02:07 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Someone
Location: Somwhere
Watch: Tudor LHD
Posts: 1,001
|
I bought a 79260p non tiger. I bought it because I personally do not like the tiger on the dial. Value aside I like the cleaner dial. Maybe if I golfed but I don't so I went with what I liked more. But back to the question of value I would go with the non tiger dial. From what I have sent the non fetches a little more right now but the future might have somthing else in store.
|
|
|
|
|
28 February 2016, 02:20 PM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,390
|
Buy what you like. I personally can't stand T. Woods, but pretend my watch commemorates a British car with a big v8 or a ww2 era airplane. . .not the adulterous cry baby.
|
|
|
|
|
28 February 2016, 02:24 PM
|
#5 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 9,200
|
Love the watch but don't like Tiger. The big blocks seems to command more money.
|
|
|
|
|
28 February 2016, 04:50 PM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SF
Watch: Ex.2.
Posts: 512
|
Any Tudor w/o the Tiger on the dial is desirable. You've been burned before with the Omega Schumacher in the past, I doubt you want that to happen again.
|
|
|
|
|
28 February 2016, 10:27 PM
|
#7 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,180
|
Buying for possible future increased value takes the fun out of the purchase and is a guessing game at best. When you buy what you like value is guaranteed.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band  Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation  The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
|
|
|
28 February 2016, 11:16 PM
|
#8 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,160
|
Tudor Tiger VS Non-Tiger 79280
I think the Prince non Tiger version is a better choice, as not everyone likes the Tiger logo, so probably harder to profit from one with the logo in the future. My Prince post Tiger 79260 says hi! 😀
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
|
|
|
28 February 2016, 11:21 PM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough
Posts: 3,759
|
No tiger
__________________
Rolex • Tudor • Omega • Panerai |
|
|
|
|
29 February 2016, 12:41 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
I wouldn't buy the Tiger personally.
|
|
|
|
|
29 February 2016, 12:49 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ivor
Location: Hampshire , UK
Posts: 205
|
I bought a non Tiger some years ago and at the time I thought the Tiger was a bit of a gimmick, just my personal opinion though
__________________
16713 GMT Master II Bi-metal 79280P Tudor Prince Chrono Blue face 116520 Daytona White face 16700 GMT Master Pepsi Bezel |
|
|
|
|
29 February 2016, 12:52 AM
|
#12 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: SoCal
Watch: forever changing
Posts: 27,274
|
I wouldn't buy these as "investments" anyway. I would buy because I like the look. 20 plus years ago I bought a used "Tiger" at a Tourneau for about $1,200. Loved it. Yes, it is worth more today. This was way before I thought about watches every day.
A Ben Bridge store started blowing theirs out shortly after that, and I thought how cool it would be to collect all the colors. I didn't have the moolah back then. The average price of Tigers runs upper teens-$4,000 these days, depending on conditions of course. If you like the color options, go for the Tiger. You won't lose your shirt. |
|
|
|
|
29 February 2016, 12:56 AM
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: East coast
Posts: 14
|
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
29 February 2016, 01:00 AM
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: East coast
Posts: 14
|
I just picked up a Tiger and really love it ... I guess the non tigers might have a better chance of going up in value.. Although I bought mine based on how I felt about the looks and condition at a certain price point
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
29 February 2016, 01:17 AM
|
#15 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: S.Florida/Ontario
Watch: 6263, 1675
Posts: 2,259
|
Quote:
 .... personally, I love the Big Blocks 
__________________
life is good |
|
|
|
|
|
29 February 2016, 06:00 AM
|
#16 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: VT
Location: Montreal
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 11
|
Thanks guys for all your help and advice ! I will go ahead with the NON-Tiger !
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
