ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

vjb.knife · 14 July 2008, 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by airhkg

Why is the depth rating of the GMT only 100m? It appears to be in a identical case as the Sub (subtle differences) and have a Triplock crown? What's the diff? Thinner crystal? Thinner case wall to house a larger or fatter movmenent?

That's a good question because the GMTIIC also has the triple lock crown. When comparing my Sub LV to my GMTIIC the overall thickness of the watch is less on the GMTIIC and the crystal and caseback appear to be thinner than the SUB.

I think I will pose this question in a new thread.

HDHNTER · 14 July 2008, 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by airhkg

Why is the depth rating of the GMT only 100m? It appears to be in a identical case as the Sub (subtle differences) and have a Triplock crown? What's the diff? Thinner crystal? Thinner case wall to house a larger or fatter movmenent?

I seem to recall reading something about the case-back being thinner on the GMT vs. the Sub which could allow for flex & at deeper depths due to pressure & compromise water resistance. I think this was in regards to the old style though. Not sure if it applies to the new. I'm sure someone will chime in shortly with the correct answer.

My .02, it's a mute point since none of us will be diving anywhere close to 50m much less 100m. Buy what smiles at you. The LV just doesn't do it for me due to the green, I'd go with the GMT IIc.

Fey · 14 July 2008, 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by what3ver

I couldn't decide in the end either, so I got both! (well, a TT GMT).

I agree with this statement, get both

Green Sub · 14 July 2008, 01:05 AM

I say focus on the features of each watch.

If you time things like I do, the LV is the obvious choice.

If you need to monitor 2 times zones, then get the GMT.

Jimbits76 · 14 July 2008, 01:44 AM

El Vee 4 me.

J

GMTII Owner · 14 July 2008, 05:33 AM

I was considering the Sub w/date before my AD introduced me to the IIc. I tried on the IIc and the rest is history. I LOVE the watch and think you will to. However, it's personal preference and you can't go wrong with either one. My next watch will be a Sub version of some sort (not sure if I want the date or no date).

Good luck and let us know what you decide.

John

springer · 14 July 2008, 05:44 AM

My opinion is the sub is...a sub with a green bezel. I don't like green.

The Gmt IIc is a complete new design, new movement and a more attractive watch. Three time zones vs one for the sub. Would I use either to dive with, no. There are much better instruments out there to dive with than a Rolex watch.

I prefer the GMT, but I know there are many sub lovers out there who would disagree.

vjb.knife · 14 July 2008, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HDHNTER

I seem to recall reading something about the case-back being thinner on the GMT vs. the Sub which could allow for flex & at deeper depths due to pressure & compromise water resistance. I think this was in regards to the old style though. Not sure if it applies to the new. I'm sure someone will chime in shortly with the correct answer.

My .02, it's a mute point since none of us will be diving anywhere close to 50m much less 100m. Buy what smiles at you. The LV just doesn't do it for me due to the green, I'd go with the GMT IIc.

I think you are right about the case and crystal but it is not exactly a mute point. I have retired from commercial diving and don't go that deep any more, but I have been considerably deeper in my diving career and I still know a few guys in the business who are doing some 1000 foot work or so.

pwrslider · 14 July 2008, 02:11 PM

would have to say.......IIc!!!!

JRWoOo · 14 July 2008, 02:19 PM

If it’s just a SS GMTIIc I would have to go with the LV. IF it’s a TT, the GMT IIc. I still think that it’s the handsomest watch I have ever laid eyes on!!!

Robb · 14 July 2008, 08:59 PM

Here are some side by sides.... You decide!!

ROLEX MAN · 14 July 2008, 09:40 PM

LV for me because they won't be around for long!

Tools · 14 July 2008, 11:48 PM

I'm still not a fan of the newer block cases, so I would pick the lines of the LV, .......then change the green bezel for a black one.....

Cuyperx · 15 July 2008, 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

I'm still not a fan of the newer block cases, so I would pick the lines of the LV, .......then change the green bezel for a black one.....

I just bought M series LV today

14 July 2008, 05:33 AM	#36
GMTII Owner "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: John Location: Nashville, TN Watch: S/S GMT Master IIc Posts: 1,210	I was considering the Sub w/date before my AD introduced me to the IIc. I tried on the IIc and the rest is history. I LOVE the watch and think you will to. However, it's personal preference and you can't go wrong with either one. My next watch will be a Sub version of some sort (not sure if I want the date or no date). Good luck and let us know what you decide. John __________________

14 July 2008, 05:44 AM	#37
springer 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,327	My opinion is the sub is...a sub with a green bezel. I don't like green. The Gmt IIc is a complete new design, new movement and a more attractive watch. Three time zones vs one for the sub. Would I use either to dive with, no. There are much better instruments out there to dive with than a Rolex watch. I prefer the GMT, but I know there are many sub lovers out there who would disagree. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

14 July 2008, 02:11 PM	#39
pwrslider "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Steve Location: SF BAY AREA CA Watch: 16710 Coke Posts: 3,047	would have to say.......IIc!!!! __________________ Rolex Blue TT Submariner (95) Rolex SS GMT IIc (08) Rolex GMT II 16710 COKE (08 for me..) Rolex Explorer II Blk (91) Breitling SuperOcean Steelfish (07) Panerai 104 & 177ti ( 04/03)

14 July 2008, 08:59 PM	#41
Robb 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Robb Location: USA Watch: BLNR Posts: 4,939	Here are some side by sides.... You decide!! Attached Images __________________ 126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN

14 July 2008, 09:40 PM	#42
ROLEX MAN 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Martin Location: Home and Away Watch: you? "YES PLEASE"! Posts: 3,719	LV for me because they won't be around for long! __________________ *it's not just about telling the time...* *happy rolexing...* I'm just a man with a passion

14 July 2008, 01:05 AM	#34
Green Sub Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Barry Location: Acworth, GA USA Posts: 622	I say focus on the features of each watch. If you time things like I do, the LV is the obvious choice. If you need to monitor 2 times zones, then get the GMT.

14 July 2008, 01:44 AM	#35
Jimbits76 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: UK Posts: 9,407	El Vee 4 me. J

14 July 2008, 02:19 PM	#40
JRWoOo Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sierra Navada CA. Posts: 114	If it’s just a SS GMTIIc I would have to go with the LV. IF it’s a TT, the GMT IIc. I still think that it’s the handsomest watch I have ever laid eyes on!!!

14 July 2008, 11:48 PM	#43
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,522	I'm still not a fan of the newer block cases, so I would pick the lines of the LV, .......then change the green bezel for a black one..... __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)