ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sfrolex · 15 July 2008, 12:55 PM

I started timing my watch to www.time.gov.

I started almost one week ago, actually 6 days and 12 hours ago.

For the first few days, perfect time, to the second.

Then over the last few days, it lost a little time. Now it's about 3 seconds slow. I'm wondering if my behavior wearing it factored in. Some nights I sleep with it, some nights do not. Some days I am more active, some days not, etc.

Is this normal? What's the typical time difference over a week or month?

I have the Sub Date

Art161 · 15 July 2008, 01:04 PM

If it is running slow and you take it off at night, place it face up. Do not place it so it is in a vertical position; that would cause it to lose time compared to the face up position.

Most Rolexes should be accurate to about 2-3 seconds per day.

The accuracy does depend on your usage of the watch.

Andad · 15 July 2008, 01:09 PM

IMO, I doubt that you would improve the accuracy that you have, more likely you will chase the positions and not get very far.

Z-Sub · 15 July 2008, 01:17 PM

That is still extremely respectable variation from the referenced time.
The more active I am, the more variation I see.

sfrolex · 15 July 2008, 02:19 PM

Thanks for the info. I guess I should be happy.

what3ver · 15 July 2008, 05:49 PM

If I'm reading this right it's lost 3 seconds in a week? And you're complaining? I'd be happy, I've never had an automatic quite that accurate. My most accurate watch is a Speedmaster which gains about .75 seconds a day on average.

My LV loses about 4 seconds a day, it's power reserve is not what it should be either, it's going in soon.

f16570 · 15 July 2008, 06:21 PM

No issues with this, this is amazing accuracy.

15 July 2008, 12:55 PM	#1
sfrolex Banned Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: sf Posts: 235	Watch running a bit slow I started timing my watch to www.time.gov. I started almost one week ago, actually 6 days and 12 hours ago. For the first few days, perfect time, to the second. Then over the last few days, it lost a little time. Now it's about 3 seconds slow. I'm wondering if my behavior wearing it factored in. Some nights I sleep with it, some nights do not. Some days I am more active, some days not, etc. Is this normal? What's the typical time difference over a week or month? I have the Sub Date Attached Images

15 July 2008, 01:04 PM	#2
Art161 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Art Location: San Francisco Watch: Sundial Posts: 2,266	If it is running slow and you take it off at night, place it face up. Do not place it so it is in a vertical position; that would cause it to lose time compared to the face up position. Most Rolexes should be accurate to about 2-3 seconds per day. The accuracy does depend on your usage of the watch. __________________ Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves. Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.

15 July 2008, 01:09 PM	#3
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,554	IMO, I doubt that you would improve the accuracy that you have, more likely you will chase the positions and not get very far. __________________ E

15 July 2008, 01:17 PM	#4
Z-Sub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: So Cal, USA Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man Posts: 7,383	That is still extremely respectable variation from the referenced time. The more active I am, the more variation I see. __________________ SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297

15 July 2008, 06:21 PM	#7
f16570 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: F Location: Scotland Watch: Exp II White Face Posts: 4,272	No issues with this, this is amazing accuracy. __________________ Why have what's new when you have what's best. f

15 July 2008, 02:19 PM	#5
sfrolex Banned Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: sf Posts: 235	Thanks for the info. I guess I should be happy.

15 July 2008, 05:49 PM	#6
what3ver Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Jim Location: San Diego Posts: 198	If I'm reading this right it's lost 3 seconds in a week? And you're complaining? I'd be happy, I've never had an automatic quite that accurate. My most accurate watch is a Speedmaster which gains about .75 seconds a day on average. My LV loses about 4 seconds a day, it's power reserve is not what it should be either, it's going in soon.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)