ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

whirlwynds · 26 May 2016, 06:04 AM

Found this one on Craigslist

whirlwynds · 26 May 2016, 06:05 AM

Another shot

michael067 · 26 May 2016, 06:17 AM

Don't look good

GLADIATOR · 26 May 2016, 11:46 PM

poor photos + craiglist + what I can see = walk away!

Adam

Fradic · 28 May 2016, 08:26 AM

Man, the watch is legit. Nothing wrong here.

Yes, the cyclop is not the best, its a faulty batch from rolex. There are multiple datejusts, subs and gmts with that flaw. but the watch is indeed authentic.

GLADIATOR · 28 May 2016, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fradic

Man, the watch is legit. Nothing wrong here.

Yes, the cyclop is not the best, its a faulty batch from rolex. There are multiple datejusts, subs and gmts with that flaw. but the watch is indeed authentic.

Anyone purchasing "that" watch on those photos and your advice would be crazy!

offrdmania · 28 May 2016, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fradic

Man, the watch is legit. Nothing wrong here.

Yes, the cyclop is not the best, its a faulty batch from rolex. There are multiple datejusts, subs and gmts with that flaw. but the watch is indeed authentic.

You came to your conclusion from those pictures how?

freefly · 29 May 2016, 02:09 PM

Nothing jumps out as being fake, but the pics are just too small to make a solid determination. Regarding the date mag, there were (are?) some cyclops issues as previously mentioned. How a date-mag window looks can also be a function of distance and focal-length of the camera lens. I can take two pictures of the same watch and have the date window look significantly different in each one, just by changing the zoom and/or distance from the camera.

26 May 2016, 06:17 AM	#3
michael067 Banned Join Date: Feb 2016 Real Name: Mike Location: Las Vegas Watch: TT DJ 16233 Posts: 1,002	Don't look good

26 May 2016, 11:46 PM	#4
GLADIATOR "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Costa Blanca, Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA Posts: 5,288	poor photos + craiglist + what I can see = walk away! Adam

28 May 2016, 08:26 AM	#5
Fradic "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Sweden Posts: 6	Man, the watch is legit. Nothing wrong here. Yes, the cyclop is not the best, its a faulty batch from rolex. There are multiple datejusts, subs and gmts with that flaw. but the watch is indeed authentic.

29 May 2016, 02:09 PM	#8
freefly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Eric Location: AZ Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs Posts: 1,974	Nothing jumps out as being fake, but the pics are just too small to make a solid determination. Regarding the date mag, there were (are?) some cyclops issues as previously mentioned. How a date-mag window looks can also be a function of distance and focal-length of the camera lens. I can take two pictures of the same watch and have the date window look significantly different in each one, just by changing the zoom and/or distance from the camera.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)