ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 August 2008, 02:44 PM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Gee, sorry it was too difficult for you to comprehend, I'll try and make it simpler for you next time.
|
7 August 2008, 03:41 PM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
|
Quote:
2. Just look at him And you never did answer my question.
__________________
__________________ |
|
7 August 2008, 04:26 PM | #33 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: John
Location: ɹǝpun
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,986
|
There are some who have the same attitude about cars... "I just need something to get me from A to B, why waste all that money etc"
We all choose to spend our disposable income on various indulgences, sometimes at the expense of other pursches. Personally, I don't need to wear a suit to work, I am happy in old jeans and a T-shirt. I have friends who easily spend $10K per annum on new clothes... I'd be lucky to spend $2K. Others will spend same on annual vacations, or restaurants/bars/clubs, or boats etc etc. The guy who puts down ANYONE elses discretionary spending is just showing everyone else how ignorant he is. I guarantee you, if he won the lottery, he would buy the fancy watch/car/boat/clothes (pick one) which he secretly covets.
__________________
Obey Gravity, it's the Law! ROLEX --- SEIKO --- HEUER TRF REHAUT T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M |
7 August 2008, 05:43 PM | #34 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Quote:
A. It was an attempt to be funny A few people liked it but if you feel the need to criticise my humor by all means go right ahead.. and: B. I was pointing out that some (a lot of) people don't understand why we spend the money we do on a timepiece, and express this by pointing out their inexpensive watches "work just as well" etc. To try and explain to these people why we feel the way we do... well, they just don't understand; much, (as a lot of people in the thread pointed out) we don't understand why some people spend more on expensive cars, or model trains, or designer sunglasses. etc. It has nothing to do with the display of opulence. Gee... I'll be more at peace and be able to sleep nights knowing you understand... |
|
7 August 2008, 07:41 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
|
The original post was tongue in cheek and nothing short of hilarious, Paul well done for injecting some humour into the forum.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best. f |
7 August 2008, 09:11 PM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canary Islands
Posts: 520
|
Quote:
__________________
16800 Matt (1986) Avatar pic by Jocke |
|
7 August 2008, 10:43 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 66
|
You appear to be the only one that clearly missed the point of this thread. Lighten up!
|
7 August 2008, 10:47 PM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
|
|
7 August 2008, 10:51 PM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
|
|
7 August 2008, 11:17 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 1,081
|
I was at Sams recently and looked at the Invicta daytona look alike and the clerk was hesitant to give me two watches at a time,, hey, they are $110 each,, cant blame her???
She looked at my GMT and said what is that and I said OH, its a replica I couldnt afford a real one.. if I could would I be here at SAMS looking at an Invicta? And she agreed. Point is: Most people cant fathom someone spending $1000s on a watch when $100 will do an adequate job, ie ,, Invicta. When I am not in a Rollie crowd my watch is a fake which makes that particular crowd more at ease. Hard to explain but I dont need the ribbing abt WHY I am wearing such an expensive watch when the economy sucks. Each set of circumstances presents its own problems. D |
7 August 2008, 11:45 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ty
Location: Irving, TX
Watch: Exp II 42mm
Posts: 919
|
My reaction would have been, "I could buy a nice Rolex for what you paid for that Harley."
__________________
Rolex Explorer II 42mm • Panerai 389 47mm |
8 August 2008, 12:23 AM | #42 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
Quote:
|
|
8 August 2008, 12:26 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
Its like a joke, if you have to explain they'll never get it
|
8 August 2008, 01:39 AM | #44 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
|
8 August 2008, 01:49 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Long Island
Watch: SS Sub Date, TT DJ
Posts: 703
|
Good Topic!
Something I have thought a lot about, more in a general "life experience" way than the specific idea of how much a Rolex watch costs...
At the end of the "big" game I believe the only thing we take with us is the experiences and sensations we have had in life. Pick and insert whatever metaphor you like here; “Can’t take it with you” “Never seen a Brink’s truck in a funeral procession.” “Never heard someone wish for more money on their deathbed” etc, etc... No one gets a performance review or exit interview at the end though so I believe in doing what you enjoy while you can. A few years ago my father was shot and paralyzed from the neck down when he stepped in and attempted to break up an attempted robbery and spent the rest of his life in a hospital bed. I kept the clothes he was wearing that day as a reminder that anything he had been putting off until “later” was never going to happen. As he got dressed to leave the house that morning the thought of never returning to his own home never entered his mind - why would it – but that in fact is what happened. There were stories about people who days after 9/11 quit their jobs and became teachers or joined the Peace Corps, while others went out and bought Porsches. Neither of those actions is right or wrong, better or worse, in my opinion either way it was something they had always wanted to do and when presented with the reality that you may not get “tomorrow” went and did what for them was going to make their lives fuller. In my opinion if, for whatever reason, owning a Rolex makes one’s life better and gives them happiness that’s all need be said. If having a ten dollar watch and giving $5000 to charity, or their grandchildren or a stranger on the street makes another person happy then that’s all need be said. It’s not about justification or right and wrong but personal choice. That’s my $.02 anyway. |
8 August 2008, 02:08 AM | #46 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
Quote:
Quote:
For non WIS and non SCIS (Sports Car Idiot Savants) you can't explain things like this and have them understand.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
||
8 August 2008, 02:46 AM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canary Islands
Posts: 520
|
Quote:
If you read the original thread again you'll understand.
__________________
16800 Matt (1986) Avatar pic by Jocke |
|
8 August 2008, 03:07 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 66
|
|
8 August 2008, 04:04 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canary Islands
Posts: 520
|
Sorry, should have said post. English is not my languaje. I try my best. Hope you'll understand this.
__________________
16800 Matt (1986) Avatar pic by Jocke |
8 August 2008, 04:24 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 66
|
|
8 August 2008, 04:55 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canary Islands
Posts: 520
|
I was just tryin to point that originally this was presented as a group of people that ends up talking about watches. In this scenario somebody talks proudly about his Rolex, and somebody else does the same about his plastic-cheap watch. In any case this second guy is suggesting (as things were exposed) any offensive atitude against the first one, but somehow, many TRF members here seem to feel like if they have to justify themselves owning a Rolex.
I just don't think that was the point of the original supossed situation, and I'll repeat what I've said before: I just can see two guys speakin proudly about their watches, and feel happy for both of them!!
__________________
16800 Matt (1986) Avatar pic by Jocke |
8 August 2008, 05:23 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: Frans ®
Location: Rotterdam
Watch: the sunrise...
Posts: 10,230
|
When someone says he only paid $4.67 for his watch he isn't proud of the watch but proud of his own cleverness. But I've given up on this, I don't feel I need to justify myself for my choices. If he's happy with his plastic watch, fine for him.
If you dissect the whole matter, there's little rationale in wearing a $5500 steel watch that not even comes close in accuracy to a $550 quartz watch. But that is the beauty of it all; we live in countries where WE make those choices and when it comes to objects like Rolexes, hand made leather flight jackets and one of a kind fountain pens, then that has nothing to do with being sensible but all with being emotional.
__________________
Member# 127
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.