ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 September 2016, 05:57 AM | #31 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
That SJ clasp is totally nonfunctional and prone to breaking, with zero second level retention capability. It was a very "not Rolex" design, all show no go, and I'm glad it went away. Hopefully they get rid of the non-adjustable Presidential clasp as well. |
|
17 September 2016, 07:06 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
|
I have a 5 digit datejust with the old clasp and it doesn't bother me. Would I prefer a hidden clasp, maybe, but not a deal breaker.
|
17 September 2016, 09:28 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,162
|
i think its very ugly. Looks like a modified job. Rest of watch is perfect!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 September 2016, 05:24 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Sky DayDate 2
Posts: 1,317
|
Aside from the question, why one would do it, and the concerns of associated cost, has any considered or researched the possibility of switching the DJ41 clasp to that of the hidden clasp, with adding a few links?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.