ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 October 2016, 12:42 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: EU
Posts: 39
|
For me, the 116900 is a pure success. The dial, typography, choice of green and yellow ... I love. Moreover, I find it meets a need and is a rare toolwatch today.
That said, I find that the double casing (the magnetic resistance is useful in Cockpit, I agree) is massive in weight and thickness. Otherwise I love the crown cut into the buckle (instead of the welded ...) so much more qualitative. As for 214270 MK2, I find it absolutely perfect so I will not be objective. Do not make the economy of trying and reflection, it is you who will wear the watch, not us |
16 October 2016, 12:49 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,332
|
What I can't understand is that I assume the designed had mocked up the photoshopped piece above and the one with the WG 3-6-9 and they choose the WG 3-6-9 to produce. To me it is a slam dunk, the photoshopped watch looks great.
|
16 October 2016, 12:59 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 575
|
Explorer 214270 hands down.
Ouch. Bad pun. Nevertheless, Explorer 214270... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.