ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 October 2016, 01:59 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
|
Decision Time...Need Your Help!
OK, a decision has to be made in the next day or two and your input/advice is much needed. Which duo should I go with:
1. BLNR and SubC Date 2. BLNR and SubC No Date Appreciate that option 2 would sort of give me the most 'difference' as one has a date and the other not. But then I do think that inherently, the SubC Date and BLNR are quite different enough and in this combo, I would have that date complication that I do tend to look for. What's a more balanced duo? Which Sub is more classic and which one is more iconic? Would having 2 watches with cyclops be too redundant? Anyone with either of the two combinations above have any words of advice? |
16 October 2016, 02:05 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
|
Go with your preference...my collection is quite redundant if 2 with a cyclops is
Some people prefer the no date, clean dial. If you want the date, go that route...I wouldn't let having the BLNR prevent that. One is a colored bezel, has a third hand, different clasp (though not obvious on the wrist) and polished center links...the other is all black bezel, brushed links. If you want a dive watch with a date but no cyclops, try a Sea Dweller 116600. My overall favorite watch. |
16 October 2016, 02:09 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Jakarta
Watch: 116610LN, 126334
Posts: 338
|
Vote for 2
|
16 October 2016, 02:09 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
Option 1
|
16 October 2016, 02:14 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 575
|
Neither option.
No discretionary purchase ever has to be made in a day or two. |
16 October 2016, 02:16 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
#1 but BLNR + LVc
|
16 October 2016, 02:17 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,991
|
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
16 October 2016, 02:26 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
I love cyclops so naturally Sub Date.
|
16 October 2016, 02:28 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 121
|
Are you buying a watch you intend to wear or something to be put in a display case and admired?
If you are going to wear the thing then either you want a date or you don't; it's as simple as that-nothing else matters. If the watch will spend its life in a display case and not on your wrist then worry about which is more iconic/balance to your collection/redundant features. Personally, I want a watch I can wear and be happy wearing. I use the date function all the time and do not own a watch that does not display the date. |
16 October 2016, 02:37 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Ken Kelvins
Location: bkk
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 587
|
|
16 October 2016, 02:39 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,437
|
|
16 October 2016, 02:40 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,255
|
|
16 October 2016, 04:29 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
|
Option 2 the 114060 is beautiful with its symmetrical dial. You would have a cyclops dial with the GMT. Best of both worlds.
|
16 October 2016, 04:36 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Scotland
Posts: 115
|
Option 2.
Clean and simple ND Sub and BLNR is my intended duo. |
16 October 2016, 06:51 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Socal
Posts: 861
|
Option 2 like you stated blnr have a date so a nd sub would give you a no cyclop option.
|
16 October 2016, 07:20 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: South Korea
Posts: 205
|
Option #2 for me.
|
16 October 2016, 07:21 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Silicon Valley
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,182
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.