ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 November 2016, 03:56 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
I don't think anyone purposefully wants scratches on a watch. The point is the watch should be used, and scratches are an unavoidable sign of use.
It's like this axe. It is beautiful and costs $350, but I'd never buy it without the intent of using it. If I bought it and put it in a closet, it means I'm an axe collector, not an axe user, and I'm just not interested in collecting unused looking tools. If my dad bought one of these 50 years ago, I'd be more thrilled to inherit it in well used condition, because it would mean something. |
13 November 2016, 04:42 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Jerry
Location: Unseen Thailand
Watch: LN/LV/BLNR
Posts: 543
|
I don't like scratches but I do accept them.
|
13 November 2016, 11:52 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Ken
Location: FloriDUH
Watch: Sub No-Date
Posts: 110
|
My Tag F1 has desk rash on the clasp, but no real scratches to speak of. My (bought used) Tag Pro 2000 is relatively scuffed up, and it just means it had a good life. My Sub is still relatively pristine with just the beginnings of some desk rash. I'll probably be sick the first time I bang it against something scratchy.
|
Tags |
"salt" , character , that's life , wear and tear |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.