|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 November 2016, 10:52 PM
|
#31 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
|
Hey, thanks guys for the kind words.
I still really appreciate all the input you guys gave me regarding the 422. As mentioned earlier, I'm very much considering swapping my 312 for a 422. It will be a nicer mix up for my collection I think in terms of size and movement since I don't own a manual yet. |
|
|
|
9 November 2016, 03:18 AM
|
#32 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: South Florida
Watch: Panerai/JLC
Posts: 16
|
I have a 321 but Looooove the 422 -- I just wish my small wrists could sport a 47mm :(
minimal to the max |
|
|
|
|
15 November 2016, 08:46 PM
|
#33 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Watch: TT GMTIIc V Series
Posts: 222
|
I love the 422 it's a brilliant piece... I just didn't think it fit my small wrist well
|
|
|
|
|
15 November 2016, 08:46 PM
|
#34 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Watch: TT GMTIIc V Series
Posts: 222
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 November 2016, 09:41 PM
|
#35 |
|
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,958
|
Panerai have way too many numbers........
I couldn't get past 231..... 
__________________
E 
|
|
|
|
|
22 November 2016, 04:38 AM
|
#36 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: India
Posts: 324
|
 Get the 422 mate Sent from my iPhone |
|
|
|
|
22 November 2016, 06:46 PM
|
#37 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Dave
Location: Singapore
Watch: Casio G-shock
Posts: 116
|
 Don't worry about the size. You don't need a Stallone's wrist to wear a panerai. Mine is only 6.5". Besides 47mm is more comfortable than most 44mm. Sent from my HM NOTE 1W using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
