ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 November 2016, 12:30 AM | #91 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,213
|
Quote:
Sure, but what about the poor door?
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds... |
|
22 November 2016, 01:20 AM | #92 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
|
Quote:
Quote:
It's your watch, feel free to make it jewelry. Mine are tools and they go where I go. |
||
22 November 2016, 01:23 AM | #93 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
I love cheap, tough, extremely accurate quartz watches. It is truly amazing how cheap that level of accuracy is vs mechanicals. My $60 Mondaine railway watch runs +0.25/sec/day.
|
22 November 2016, 01:25 AM | #94 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,992
|
I have just designed and patented what is know as Rolexcottonsock. You keep the bezel guard on and all the stickers and then envelope the watch in a sock with a cotton wool lining. Also included is a stick so you can beat any nasty door surrounds. Only joking ha ha !
__________________
RRGHOST1 |
22 November 2016, 01:32 AM | #95 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 34
|
I wonder what type of metal they use for these door jams...?
|
22 November 2016, 01:39 AM | #96 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,302
|
904L is very durable. Any type of metal can ding just be careful when next to walls,door jams or seatbelts.
|
22 November 2016, 02:06 AM | #97 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
belt buckles.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
22 November 2016, 02:21 AM | #98 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Quote:
|
|
22 November 2016, 03:43 AM | #99 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,448
|
I actually do agree with the rolexes I've had picking up more dings and marks than most other brands I can remember having. I'm EXTREMELY careful with my watches and I've found that even being hyper cautious, there are marks within two weeks of new. I accept it, but realize that now even looking at my tudors, which I've worn much harder...they seem to be pretty perfect. Strange.
|
22 November 2016, 03:47 AM | #100 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 398
|
It seems everyone has their take on what a "tool watch" is.
The sub is a mechanical tool watch. It does everything a $150 seiko diver can do. It's just built with better materials and tighter tolerances. Tools come in all price brackets. There are low quality and high quality tools. But they are a tool nonetheless. Now if Rolex started adding clear display backs to their sport watches, double AR and bling to their movements... Well I would agree, they are no longer tool watches. Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk |
22 November 2016, 04:39 AM | #101 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Kristofer
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: my feet.
Posts: 2,364
|
Here is a picture of my Daytona. I'm not the OP; but I feel we needed SOME kind of photo for a 4-page thread about scuffs and scratches. Lesson 1: Mindfulness. This will avoid most issues. Lesson 2: Living comfortably. If you're not comfortable scratching your watch, maybe you shouldn't have that watch.
__________________
No sticker left behind. "Better three hours too soon, than a minute too late." "All we have to do is decide what to do with the time that is given to us." ref. 116520 Daytona - 10/2014 |
22 November 2016, 04:54 AM | #102 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wild Blue Yonder
Watch: 116710 LN
Posts: 1,613
|
It's steel. Hard but still malleable. Honestly I don't why many here buy watches much less actually wear them.
|
22 November 2016, 04:56 AM | #103 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
|
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. I believe 316l is more scratch/dent/ding resistant than 904l. No need for the internet to quantify my findings....I have about 15 years of real life observations to back up my claim. Don't believe me? No problem.
|
22 November 2016, 04:56 AM | #104 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wild Blue Yonder
Watch: 116710 LN
Posts: 1,613
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.