ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 September 2016, 09:58 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 476
|
My decision was...
This beauty. Only a couple of hours old. New from AD. Peeled off for your enjoyment. Better pictures tomorrow in better light. Quite happy right now.
__________________
______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono |
25 September 2016, 10:19 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Watch: RG Olive DD40
Posts: 1,794
|
Congrats! The SD is really growing on me.
|
25 September 2016, 10:46 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,145
|
Congratulations! You just purchased one of the BEST watches on earth! Enjoy it and keep it. ITS A CLASSIC!!!
|
25 September 2016, 11:07 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 476
|
Thank you! I agree is a classic and I own one. I'll do both.
__________________
______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono |
25 September 2016, 11:08 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 476
|
__________________
______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono |
25 September 2016, 01:07 PM | #36 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5712
Posts: 2,614
|
SD4K all day. I can't believe how much more comfortable it is to me than the 114060. It is also perfectly balanced aesthetically, IMO.
|
25 September 2016, 01:27 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: 114060, BLNR
Posts: 739
|
I am crazy about the Hulk. It is so different and distinctive and the combination of the cerachrom bezel and that dial ... I would go for that.
|
25 September 2016, 04:21 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 952
|
I don't understand why you struggle with the decision and need our help. From what I have read from you it is highly possible:
You buy SD4K. And ended up flipping it. Then buy the LVC. And ended up flipping it. Or You buy LVC. And ended up flipping it. Then buy the SD4K. And ended up flipping it. So, why struggling between the two? You are gonna flip them anyway...LOL I'll suggest you to do LVC then SD4K. |
25 September 2016, 04:56 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 398
|
Good choice
|
25 September 2016, 05:01 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: RG SeaQ Pano date
Posts: 321
|
Love the date without the cyclops. Very nice!
|
25 September 2016, 10:34 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
|
How about a compromise and get the 116610?
|
25 September 2016, 10:44 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,572
|
|
25 September 2016, 11:39 PM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,419
|
Congrats Mario!! Super piece!
|
16 October 2016, 01:14 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 476
|
__________________
______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono |
16 October 2016, 03:02 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: dave
Location: miami
Watch: me ride bikes
Posts: 1,938
|
Congrats from a local guy (Pembroke Pines)
|
16 October 2016, 03:04 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 476
|
__________________
______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono |
16 October 2016, 03:11 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Chi-town
Watch: Starbucks, Panerai
Posts: 1,186
|
Congrats! You made a great choice.
__________________
Starbucks, Speedmaster Professional, PAM 212 |
16 October 2016, 03:21 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
|
I don't see a lot of difference between a SubC and the SD other than the magnifier absent on the SD and the added thickness of the SD.
What am I missing? |
16 October 2016, 06:54 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Joe
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,835
|
Big CONGRATS! Personally that choice would have been an easy one. SD4 all the way. Fortunately though, Rolex gives us a pamphlet filled with beautiful watches. :)
Cheers, Joe
__________________
"Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works." - S.J. |
16 October 2016, 06:56 PM | #50 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Joe
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,835
|
Quote:
Cheers, Joe
__________________
"Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works." - S.J. |
|
16 October 2016, 07:00 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 622
|
SD 4000 for me too, I owned a Hulk....for about 3 weeks and don't miss it.
|
16 October 2016, 08:24 PM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: US
Posts: 75
|
both are stunning watches but if i had just one choice, i would go with the Hulk
|
2 December 2016, 03:53 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 34
|
I vote for the SD4K
|
2 December 2016, 11:41 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
|
Could have gotten the SD4000 new for the same price as the LV. Went with LV hands down!
|
2 December 2016, 11:56 PM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
All depends on the wrist size.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.