![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Denmark
Watch: Planet Ocean GMT
Posts: 1
|
Opinions needed
Hi all,
I'm currently browsing between a lot of PAMs. After many months I have narrowed down to two watches; the 372 and the 560. I really like both watches because they, in my opinion, look like quintessential Panerais. But which one should I get? Is it worth spending that extra money on the 372? Hope some of are able to provide some input :-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
|
I guess much could depend on the size of your wrist because the 372 is a 47mm whereas the 560 is 'only' 44mm.
If money is not an issue, I would go 372 all day every day. I love that reference and it's about as pure Panerai as they come. However, it's your money, your watch and your wrist so it has to be what sings to you. Try both on and see which one screams "buy me, buy meeeeeee!" the loudest. Good luck and welcome ![]()
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Willy.B.Banned
Location: Sheol
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,721
|
Quote:
Wot he said ![]() Oh and welcome. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
If you are wearing a planet ocean gmt, I bet you can handle the 372 well. If I had the wrist I'd get that one for the aesthetics.
__________________
member#3242 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: dp
Location: chicago, usa
Watch: panerai
Posts: 2,369
|
3
7 2 ....
__________________
dp just living the dream chicago, usa chgo_risti on IG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,881
|
With > 7inch wrist - 372 no brainer
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,845
|
This
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: IL
Posts: 95
|
I know the 372 is the popular choice.
However, over the years I've decided I like the squared, chunky edges and lines of the Bettarini case a little bit more than the curvy, swoopy 1950's case. Additionally I don't like ecru lume. So 560 would be my choice. Cheers and welcome. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,987
|
I would say ...
:)
__________________
135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 36,191
|
Both are great choices. 560 checks a lot of boxes for me, but all else being equal, I'd go for the one without the "8 DAYS" on the dial.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Yes
Posts: 1,514
|
Three seven two, brown leather strap
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
|
Definitely this, 372 on distressed leather strap. Awesome shot, Nick
![]()
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,845
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,855
|
372
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Philippines
Posts: 9
|
three 7 two in a heart beat
![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX