![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
Stabilize hands on this 5513 or not?
This is my late R Series 5513. The dial, hands and bezel insert are original. What appear to be dial scratches in the photo are scratches on the acrylic crystal.
I purchased this watch over six years ago and have not had it serviced. It recently stopped running. I decided to send it to RSC Dallas for service. Unfortunately, they refused to service the watch unless I allowed them to replace all three hands. I declined and asked RSC to send the watch back to me (when I have more time I will try and post about my interaction with RSC; it was interesting). It is now in for service at a local watchmaker who has a Rolex parts account and is CW21 certified and is considered the best in the area. Should I have him stabilize the hands or not? I wore this watch as my daily wearer for the last six years and the tritium has held up pretty well. I am in the process of getting another daily wearer and will retire this watch to special occasions only. So, it should not see much abuse. As you can see, there are some light racks and crazing. But so far, no major chunks have fallen out. So, to stabilize or not. My gut tells me no. I am interested in your opinions. Thanks,
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
|
Some macro shots would help. If just cracked, stabilise absolutely. That can be done invisibly from the rear of the hands.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
Sorry about the pic, but it is at the watchmakers' and I negligee to take more pics before dropping it off.
Thanks, Howard
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
"neglected"
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Well, if you're not going to wear it daily any more - no.
No 'you with negligee' pics either, thanks!
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
Quote:
The mind is the first thing to go. Thanks!
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 885
|
Went through this myself recently, suggest you try to stabilize if you plan on wearing the watch at all. With the hands cased inside the watch the lume probably won't just keep falling out unless you bang into something with it, but how often does that happen?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
I am pretty careful, but. . .
Quote:
![]() Thanks for the input.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,672
|
What harm could come out of stabilizing the hands?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
Don't have a clue? My knowledge base is limited on this. But I am always reluctant to change stock.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
Just curious, are there any cons for stabilizing?
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,559
|
I would definitely stabilize the hands. No harm at all.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
Thanks Springer!
Was hoping to get some expert advice. Thanks!
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,556
|
I won't change the look. If you dont' stablize the hands and the lume is cracked then usually within no time you will be getting it opened again for get rid of chunks of lume floating around.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
Thanks.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Possible risk of damage during the process itself, and/or risk of discolouration.
If they change colour, IMO, what's the point? May as well leave them and get them re-lumed IF they fall apart. Just my take on it.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,672
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Here and there
Posts: 580
|
I would go for it.
If there ends up being no big difference, thats a great result. If there is a big difference then get them resumed before they put the watch back together. With the cracks the lume will drop out before long and then you are going to have the cost of another clean/service. I therefore do not see a downside with trying to stabilise the,. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
Thanks for the input everyone!
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
So what have you decided?!
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
I have not completely decided but I am leaning to leaving it alone for now. And if I don't call soon, my watchmaker will have it ready so the decision will be made for me.
My concern is a bad result and then trying to get the hands re-lumed to match the dial. And if I ever traded it, I would need to disclose the re-lume. Not everyone would care, but I would. Lot of great advice and opinions. And I appreciate everyone's input. This forum is great.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
So, I am probably taking the advice from your prior post. As you said, if I wind up with non matching hands, "what's the point."
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: MQ-24-7B2LLJF
Posts: 29,094
|
I got mine (L serial) completely overhauled by the RSC, though it already had a water damaged service dial when I bought it (cheap). Now it has new dial, hands, crown and pearl and is great for daily wear.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
That is a great daily wearer; but I did not agree with RSC's approach on my watch
Quote:
But my 5513 is otherwise in very good condition. Also, my experience with RSC Dallas was different. The estimate they emailed me noted "damaged" to the dial and all three hands. However, my opinion is that this is their pro forma approach. When I spoke with three different service reps's I was told that the dial was in beautiful shape but for some loss at the 10:00 dot and it did not need replacing. After further query, that advised me that they did not have a replacement dial that was appropriate for the 5513. They also wanted to put a new tritium second hand on and new lume hour and minute hands. So, I would have paid for the privilege of having new but not matching hands and an old creamy tritium dial. I understand their approach; and it is understandable from their perspective - bringing the watch back to spec. and reducing the possibility of future damage from cracking lume. But not from my perspective of having a vintage watch. So I instructed them to send the watch back. In my opinion, putting new hands on this watch with an aged dial would have looked bad and reduced the value. The service reps conceded both points, but their hands were tied. On the upside, at least the case, back, movement and band were authenticated by Rolex. Something which I always wanted. So, it was a learning experience with at lease the benefit of authentication.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
And another thing!
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Quote:
There's also - again IMHO - an irrational fear of 'what if particles of loose lume fall in the movement?' OMG! Alert the media! I doubt it will destroy the movement, in the short term. It wouldn't be long before the offending missing chunks of lume made their absence known to the passionately enthusiastic - 'obsessed'? and I speak for myself, too - owner, noticed. It would survive a crumb or two of ancient Tritium, before being sped away to the nearest emergency watch-doctor. They're largely made of Swiss steel, not Swiss chocolate... or cheese... ![]() ![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,556
|
I had Spencer Klein do a Seiko 6159 and it turned out perfect. Also he patched up the hands and matched the lume on it.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,682
|
Thanks for the input; but I decided not to stabilize the lime
Quote:
Update, my watchmaker just called and my 5513 is ready. It is running +-2 even though it is not a certified chron; not bad for a 40 year old watch. I will pick up it later in the week and post pictures when I can. Thanks all. ![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
5513 , hands , lume , stabilize , tritium |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.