ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Vintagerolexnewbie · 10 May 2017, 02:56 AM

Although I have stumbled across this fat lady

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Vintagerolexnewbie · 10 May 2017, 02:58 AM

Does it look overpolished???
Thanks

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

rmlovett1 · 10 May 2017, 04:09 AM

If the S/N on the 1680 dates it to 1978 (ad states it's from 1978), I'd definitely question the validity. There's some arguments to a red sub being produced after 73/74...but given the replacement pieces on this one...I'd probably pass

10 May 2017, 02:56 AM	#31
Vintagerolexnewbie "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Real Name: Jack Location: Bromley Watch: Rolex Sub 16613 Posts: 12	Although I have stumbled across this fat lady Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

10 May 2017, 02:58 AM	#32
Vintagerolexnewbie "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Real Name: Jack Location: Bromley Watch: Rolex Sub 16613 Posts: 12	Does it look overpolished??? Thanks Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

10 May 2017, 04:09 AM	#33
rmlovett1 2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Richard Location: GA Watch: YTBD Posts: 23,745	If the S/N on the 1680 dates it to 1978 (ad states it's from 1978), I'd definitely question the validity. There's some arguments to a red sub being produced after 73/74...but given the replacement pieces on this one...I'd probably pass

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)