The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 June 2017, 04:08 AM   #31
Rocco21
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Rob
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 126660,126600
Posts: 1,324
2 of my favorites.Simple beauty.
Rocco21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2017, 04:41 AM   #32
mattty
"TRF" Member
 
mattty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: England, UK
Posts: 293
More is less, fantastic.
mattty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2017, 07:40 AM   #33
dubins930
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dubins930's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Aaron
Location: WA
Posts: 840
I currently have the 214270... And I'm looking at a 14060... its the same...but different

Awesome watches! Can't go wrong with classics!
dubins930 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2017, 01:23 PM   #34
bradbyrd1110
"TRF" Member
 
bradbyrd1110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: 1110
Location: East Coast
Watch: 126710BLNR
Posts: 323
I'm drooling.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
126710BLNR
bradbyrd1110 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2017, 01:29 PM   #35
tatery
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: West Coast
Watch: 16570 polar
Posts: 222
Great choices!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
tatery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2017, 02:00 PM   #36
Jaycnyp
"TRF" Member
 
Jaycnyp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Jay
Location: Classified
Watch: Addict
Posts: 1,122
Looks great. When I add next I will have a very similar duo. And in SS it is the duo!!!!
Jaycnyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2017, 06:44 PM   #37
juliet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Zealand
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus09 View Post
Nice pair ! Man the 114060 looks huge compared to the exp


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have the Explorer and have been trying on the Sub this past week. What really surprised me was how SMALL the Sub face looks side by side. Both basically the same size case but the bezel on the Sub really reduces the size of the dial.

Certainly the Sub feels thicker, but when just looking straight down on both the Explorer wears comparatively large.

As an aside I found the ND much clearer to read than the Date. I wasn't expecting the cyclops to have such an impact, particularly when the hands are passing through it, makes it not particularly legible. The GMT I found even worse. Maybe I'm just used to how clear and easy to read the Explorer is. If I get another Rolex it will definitely be the ND Sub.
juliet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 12:38 AM   #38
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by cop414 View Post
Excellent!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Mickol View Post
Very nice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
The more watches I own, the more I appreciate not having a date to set. A ND sub, Daytona, and explorer 1 would be my perfect trio.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sea-dweller View Post
Nice duo!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerry62 View Post
Great pair
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRolexKingofLV View Post
Great looking pair Jim
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
I like your style Jim
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Always good to get back to fundamentals
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJM914 View Post
Nice! Classic and clean look!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocco21 View Post
2 of my favorites.Simple beauty.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattty View Post
More is less, fantastic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dubins930 View Post
I currently have the 214270... And I'm looking at a 14060... its the same...but different

Awesome watches! Can't go wrong with classics!
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradbyrd1110 View Post
I'm drooling.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by tatery View Post
Great choices!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaycnyp View Post
Looks great. When I add next I will have a very similar duo. And in SS it is the duo!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by juliet View Post
I have the Explorer and have been trying on the Sub this past week. What really surprised me was how SMALL the Sub face looks side by side. Both basically the same size case but the bezel on the Sub really reduces the size of the dial.

Certainly the Sub feels thicker, but when just looking straight down on both the Explorer wears comparatively large.

As an aside I found the ND much clearer to read than the Date. I wasn't expecting the cyclops to have such an impact, particularly when the hands are passing through it, makes it not particularly legible. The GMT I found even worse. Maybe I'm just used to how clear and easy to read the Explorer is. If I get another Rolex it will definitely be the ND Sub.
Thanks very much, guys. No doubt that the 36mm Exp. I wears larger due to the smaller bezel. A nice change for me from some 47mm PAM's.
jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 12:39 AM   #39
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewbacca View Post
nice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTX I View Post
Great pair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewbacca View Post
REPORTED!!!!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Thuilln View Post
The best of the best.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTX I View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjclark32 View Post
Nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoilsofwar01 View Post
Very tidy watches Jim, all the very best "H"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus09 View Post
Nice pair ! Man the 114060 looks huge compared to the exp


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerardus View Post
Congratz! good duo!
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2ar2c1 View Post
nice, well done and enjoy those 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauebm View Post
114060 is the core Rolex, imo. Enjoy!
Quote:
Originally Posted by sensui View Post
Yeah, it really is a classic choice you can't go wrong with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by socialpro View Post
Always seems to go through that circle, dont it? Great choices.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttomczak View Post
Great set!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFi View Post
Congrats Jim! Perfect duo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchwatcher View Post
Nice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1William View Post
Great watches. Two classics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnicoJG View Post
Great choice!
My personal thanks to you all, too.
jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 12:55 AM   #40
Gharddog03
"TRF" Member
 
Gharddog03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Genaro
Location: Fresno Ca.
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 4,466
Classics!
Gharddog03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 03:20 AM   #41
SUB14
"TRF" Member
 
SUB14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Danny
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhcam8 View Post
After many years of Panerai, Blancpain, and so forth decided to get back to me roots.

Sub C 114060; Explorer I 114270 36mm
Very nice duo! Can you post a couple more pics please, like head-on wrist shots, etc?

I have the 114060 and I'm thinking about adding the 114270, but I would like to get a better idea about it's size.
SUB14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 03:29 AM   #42
Marcus09
"TRF" Member
 
Marcus09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Batman
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 1,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB14 View Post
Very nice duo! Can you post a couple more pics please, like head-on wrist shots, etc?



I have the 114060 and I'm thinking about adding the 114270, but I would like to get a better idea about it's size.


Well maybe I can help, I have the GMT C and the explorer. Here are some shots.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Marcus09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 03:36 AM   #43
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
Very nice pair Jim
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 09:52 AM   #44
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,449
The 114060 and the 114270 make a nearly perfect pair that would be acceptable in virtually any setting.

Put the 114270 on a leather strap and you could stretch its utility even more.

If for some reason I had to liquidate, my 14060M and my 114270 would serve my needs quite well.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 09:55 AM   #45
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
The 114060 and the 114270 make a nearly perfect pair that would be acceptable in virtually any setting.

Put the 114270 on a leather strap and you could stretch it's utility even more.

If for some reason I had to liquidate, my 14060M and my 114270 would serve my needs quite well.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 10:01 AM   #46
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB14 View Post
Very nice duo! Can you post a couple more pics please, like head-on wrist shots, etc?

I have the 114060 and I'm thinking about adding the 114270, but I would like to get a better idea about it's size.
I can tell the time at a glance with this - a hard criterion of mine. I can wear a 47mm Radiomir, to give you an idea of​ my wrist size.

jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 11:47 PM   #47
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gharddog03 View Post
Classics!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus09 View Post
Well maybe I can help, I have the GMT C and the explorer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick c View Post
Very nice pair Jim
Thank you.
jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 11:56 PM   #48
tgoose1
"TRF" Member
 
tgoose1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 668
Basics looking good!
tgoose1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2017, 12:02 AM   #49
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgoose1 View Post
Basics looking good!
jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2017, 01:02 AM   #50
RMC12
"TRF" Member
 
RMC12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Watch: Smurf/Hulk/1680
Posts: 2,920
Cannot go wrong with that pairing!!!

Huge congrats!!
RMC12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2017, 01:24 AM   #51
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMC12 View Post
Cannot go wrong with that pairing!!!

Huge congrats!!
Thanks, Jon
jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2017, 01:52 AM   #52
SUB14
"TRF" Member
 
SUB14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Danny
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus09 View Post
Well maybe I can help, I have the GMT C and the explorer. Here are some shots.
Thanks for posting some pictures, great watches!


Quote:
Originally Posted by jhcam8 View Post
I can tell the time at a glance with this - a hard criterion of mine. I can wear a 47mm Radiomir, to give you an idea of​ my wrist size.
What a great looking watch! I really like the more classic proportions which are spot-on in my opinion! Now I definitely need to find a nice example and see how it fits.
SUB14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2017, 01:59 AM   #53
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB14 View Post
Thanks for posting some pictures, great watches!

What a great looking watch! I really like the more classic proportions which are spot-on in my opinion! Now I definitely need to find a nice example and see how it fits.
Thanks - good luck!
jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.